Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18341671›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2008

Absence of respiratory effects with ivabradine in patients with asthma.

K Suresh Babu, Frantisek Gadzik, Stephen T Holgate

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01365286 (Heart Rate Lowering Efficacy and Respiratory Safety of Ivabradine in Patients With Obstructive Airway Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01365286 phase4completednot on this mapstarted 2009, after this paper: background citation

Heart Rate Lowering Efficacy and Respiratory Safety of Ivabradine in Patients With Obstructive Airway Disease

TypeinterventionalSponsorMedical University of LodzRan2009 to 2011Enrolled40ConditionsAsthma, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)ArmsIvabradine (Procoralan), Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

K Suresh BabuInfection, Inflammation and Repair, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK. sureshbabu97@gmail.com
Frantisek Gadzik
Stephen T Holgate
Southampton General Hospital · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G0800766
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimbeta-Blockers are commonly prescribed for stable angina and are recommended as initial therapy. However, beta-blockers are contraindicated in patients with obstructive airway disease because of a risk of bronchoconstriction. Ivabradine is a specific heart rate-lowering agent that acts via I(f) pacemaker channels in the sinoatrial node with no beta-adrenoreceptor activity. Ivabradine has been recently approved for the treatment of stable angina. This study assessed the effects of repeated administration of ivabradine on lung function in patients with asthma.

methodsIn this double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study, 20 subjects with asthma received either oral ivabradine 10 mg b.i.d. or placebo for 4.5 days. Forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) and peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) were designated as the main outcome variable. Diary cards were used to monitor asthma symptoms on a five-point scale, rescue medication usage, and adverse events.

resultsThere were no significant differences in mean variation of FEV(1) (ivabradine P = 0.664; placebo P = 0.652) or PEFR (ivabradine P = 0.153; placebo P = 0.356) from baseline following administration of ivabradine. There was also no significant difference in maximum percent variation in FEV(1) or PEF between treatment groups (P = 0.994; FEV(1) and P = 0.704; PEF). On a similar note, there was no significant difference in asthma symptoms or rescue medication usage reported between the two groups. Adverse events were generally mild-to-moderate in intensity and no cardiovascular or serious adverse events were recorded.

conclusionsThis study confirms that ivabradine does not affect respiratory function or symptoms in patients with asthma and therefore represents a valuable therapeutic alternative to beta-blockers for treating patients with stable angina and asthma.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAnti-Asthmatic AgentsAsthmaBenzazepinesCross-Over StudiesDouble-Blind MethodFemaleForced Expiratory VolumeHumansIvabradineMaleMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeAnti-Asthmatic AgentsBenzazepinesIvabradine

Identifiers

PMID18341671
PMCPMC2485243
OpenAlexW2065189499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.