Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18340642›Full record

ArticleJournal of cellular physiology2008

X-inactivation reveals epigenetic anomalies in most hESC but identifies sublines that initiate as expected.

Lisa L Hall, Meg Byron, John Butler, Klaus A Becker, Angel Nelson, Michal Amit, Joseph Itskovitz-Eldor, Janet Stein, Gary Stein, Carol Ware and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cellular physiology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed
9.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 115 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Unusual maintenance of X chromosome inactivation predisposes female lymphocytes for increased expression from the inactive X.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lisa L HallDepartment of Cell Biology, U Mass Med School, Worcester, Massachusetts 01655, USA. lisa.hall@umassmed.edu
Meg Byron
John Butler
Klaus A Becker
Angel Nelson
Michal Amit
Joseph Itskovitz-Eldor
Janet Stein
Gary Stein
Carol Ware
Jeanne B Lawrence
Technion – Israel Institute of Technology · IL

Funding

CONTROL OF OSTEOBLAST PROLIFERATION AND DIFFERENTIATIONR01AR039588 · NIAMS · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI LIAN, JANE B., STEIN, GARY S. · 1990 to 2019
$8.0M
XIST RNA: A Key to Understand Epigenome Regulation and Chromosome StructureR01GM053234 · NIGMS · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI LAWRENCE, JEANNE BENTLEY · 1996 to 2017
$5.1M
IDENTIFICATION OF HUMAN HISTONE GENE REGULATORY SEQUENCER01GM032010 · NIGMS · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI STEIN, GARY S. · 1985 to 2006
$3.4M
UW/FHCRC Exploratory Center for Human ES Cell ResearchP20GM069983 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI BLAU, C. ANTHONY · 2003 to 2006
$3.0M
Infrastructure for Stem Cell Production &DistributionR24RR018405 · NCRR · TECHNION-ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI ITSKOVITZ-ELDOR, JOSEPH · 2002 to 2007
$1.5M
NCRR NIH HHS R24 RR018405NCRR NIH HHS R24RR18405NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR039588NIGMS NIH HHS GM032010NIGMS NIH HHS GM069983-01NIGMS NIH HHS GM53234NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM069983NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM032010NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM053234
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The clinical and research value of human embryonic stem cells (hESC) depends upon maintaining their epigenetically naïve, fully undifferentiated state. Inactivation of one X chromosome in each cell of mammalian female embryos is a paradigm for one of the earliest steps in cell specialization through formation of facultative heterochromatin. Mouse ES cells are derived from the inner cell mass (ICM) of blastocyst stage embryos prior to X-inactivation, and cultured murine ES cells initiate this process only upon differentiation. Less is known about human X-inactivation during early development. To identify a human ES cell model for X-inactivation and study differences in the epigenetic state of hESC lines, we investigated X-inactivation in all growth competent, karyotypically normal, NIH approved, female hESC lines and several sublines. In the vast majority of undifferentiated cultures of nine lines examined, essentially all cells exhibit hallmarks of X-inactivation. However, subcultures of any hESC line can vary in X-inactivation status, comprising distinct sublines. Importantly, we identified rare sublines that have not yet inactivated Xi and retain competence to undergo X-inactivation upon differentiation. Other sublines exhibit defects in counting or maintenance of XIST expression on Xi. The few hESC sublines identified that have not yet inactivated Xi may reflect the earlier epigenetic state of the human ICM and represent the most promising source of NIH hESC for study of human X-inactivation. The many epigenetic anomalies seen indicate that maintenance of fully unspecialized cells, which have not formed Xi facultative heterochromatin, is a delicate epigenetic balance difficult to maintain in culture.

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationCell LineEpigenesis, GeneticX Chromosome InactivationAnimalsChromosomes, Human, XDosage Compensation, GeneticEmbryonic Stem CellsFemaleHumansMiceRNA, Long NoncodingRNA, UntranslatedRNA, Long NoncodingRNA, UntranslatedXIST non-coding RNA

Identifiers

PMID18340642
PMCPMC3057623
OpenAlexW1970545305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.