SynthesisJournal of human genetics2008
Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene polymorphisms and lung cancer: a meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of human genetics, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase 677TT genotype may be associated with an increased lung cancer risk in North China: an updated meta-analysis.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2014Pooled it
- Influence of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase C677T polymorphism on the risk of lung cancer and the clinical response to platinum-based chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: an updated meta-analysis.Yonsei medical journal · 2013Pooled it
- Quantitative assessment of the effect of MTHFR polymorphisms on the risk of lung carcinoma.Molecular biology reports · 2012Pooled it
- Meta-analysis on MTHFR polymorphism and lung cancer susceptibility in East Asian populations.Biomedical reports · 2013Article
- Article
- One-carbon metabolism pathway gene variants and risk of clear cell renal cell carcinoma in a Chinese population.PloS one · 2013Article
- Sex-specific association of sequence variants in CBS and MTRR with risk for promoter hypermethylation in the lung epithelium of smokers.Carcinogenesis · 2012Article
- Single nucleotide polymorphisms as susceptibility, prognostic, and therapeutic markers of nonsmall cell lung cancer.Lung Cancer (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2012Review
- Genetic and epigenomic footprints of folate.Progress in molecular biology and translational science · 2012Review
- Article
- Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase C677T polymorphism in patients with lung cancer in a Korean population.BMC medical genetics · 2011Article
- International Lung Cancer Consortium: coordinated association study of 10 potential lung cancer susceptibility variants.Carcinogenesis · 2010Article
- Review and pooled analysis of studies on MTHFR C677T polymorphism and esophageal cancer.Toxicology letters · 2009Review
- MTHFR rs1801131 GG Genotype Combined with Serum LDH Level Predicts Lung Adenocarcinoma Susceptibility and Poor Prognosis in Guangxi Zhuang Population.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
So far, case-control studies on the association between methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) gene polymorphisms and lung cancer provide controversial or inconclusive results. To clarify the effect of MTHFR polymorphisms on the risk of lung cancer, a meta-analysis of all case-control observational studies was performed. The studies provided 5,111/6,415 cases/controls for C677T and 5,087/6,232 cases/controls for A1298C. The heterogeneity (P=0.0001, I(2)=76.6%) for C677T among the eight studies was extreme. Cluster analyses based on the frequencies of the C677T genotype of the control group in each study revealed that the studies could not cluster together according to their ethnicity. The random effects (RE) model showed that the 677T allele was not associated with the risk of lung cancer compared with the C allele [OR=1.12, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.97-1.28), P=0.12]. The contrast of homozygotes, recessive model, dominant model produced the same pattern of results as the allele contrast. In regard to the A1298C polymorphism, there was no heterogeneity among the seven studies comparing the C versus the A allele (P=0.24, I(2)=24.4%), but no significant association was detected by the RE model or the fixed effects model [FE odds ratio (OR)=0.99 (0.93-1.05) and RE OR=1.00 (0.92-1.08)]. The effect of MTHFR polymorphisms (C677T, A1298C) on the risk of lung cancer was undetectable, even though analyzed on a relatively good number of subjects (totally 11,526 subjects) by meta-analysis (statistical power = 93.9%). Although MTHFR polymorphisms were associated with the risk of colorectal cancer, leukemia, and gastric cancer supported by other meta-analysis, our pooled data suggest no evidence for a major role of these two variants in carcinogenesis of lung cancer. The results implied that different tumors evolve by different pathological pathways and the roles of MTHFR in cancer is determined by its target genes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.