Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18340404›Full record

SynthesisJournal of human genetics2008

Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene polymorphisms and lung cancer: a meta-analysis.

Renfang Mao, Yihui Fan, Yan Jin, Jing Bai, Songbin Fu

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of human genetics, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase 677TT genotype may be associated with an increased lung cancer risk in North China: an updated meta-analysis.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2014
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Genetic and epigenomic footprints of folate.Progress in molecular biology and translational science · 2012
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Renfang MaoLaboratory of Medical Genetics, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, 150081, China.
Yihui FanLaboratory of Medical Genetics, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, 150081, China.
Yan JinLaboratory of Medical Genetics, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, 150081, China.
Jing BaiLaboratory of Medical Genetics, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, 150081, China.
Songbin FuLaboratory of Medical Genetics, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, 150081, China. fusb@ems.hrbmu.edu.cn.
Harbin Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

So far, case-control studies on the association between methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) gene polymorphisms and lung cancer provide controversial or inconclusive results. To clarify the effect of MTHFR polymorphisms on the risk of lung cancer, a meta-analysis of all case-control observational studies was performed. The studies provided 5,111/6,415 cases/controls for C677T and 5,087/6,232 cases/controls for A1298C. The heterogeneity (P=0.0001, I(2)=76.6%) for C677T among the eight studies was extreme. Cluster analyses based on the frequencies of the C677T genotype of the control group in each study revealed that the studies could not cluster together according to their ethnicity. The random effects (RE) model showed that the 677T allele was not associated with the risk of lung cancer compared with the C allele [OR=1.12, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.97-1.28), P=0.12]. The contrast of homozygotes, recessive model, dominant model produced the same pattern of results as the allele contrast. In regard to the A1298C polymorphism, there was no heterogeneity among the seven studies comparing the C versus the A allele (P=0.24, I(2)=24.4%), but no significant association was detected by the RE model or the fixed effects model [FE odds ratio (OR)=0.99 (0.93-1.05) and RE OR=1.00 (0.92-1.08)]. The effect of MTHFR polymorphisms (C677T, A1298C) on the risk of lung cancer was undetectable, even though analyzed on a relatively good number of subjects (totally 11,526 subjects) by meta-analysis (statistical power = 93.9%). Although MTHFR polymorphisms were associated with the risk of colorectal cancer, leukemia, and gastric cancer supported by other meta-analysis, our pooled data suggest no evidence for a major role of these two variants in carcinogenesis of lung cancer. The results implied that different tumors evolve by different pathological pathways and the roles of MTHFR in cancer is determined by its target genes.

Indexed as

Polymorphism, GeneticCluster AnalysisGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansLung NeoplasmsMethylenetetrahydrofolate Reductase (NADPH2)Models, GeneticMutationOdds RatioMethylenetetrahydrofolate Reductase (NADPH2)

Identifiers

PMID18340404
OpenAlexW2115712077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.