Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18339971›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics2008

The use of occupation isoboles for analysis of a response mediated by two receptors: M2 and M3 muscarinic receptor subtype-induced mouse stomach contractions.

Alan S Braverman, Ronald J Tallarida, Michael R Ruggieri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Synergistic interaction between the two mechanisms of action of tapentadol in analgesia.The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics · 2011
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Oxycodone combinations for pain relief.Drugs of today (Barcelona, Spain : 1998) · 2010
    Review
  5. Comparison of human and porcine gastric clasp and sling fiber contraction by M2 and M3 muscarinic receptors.American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology · 2010
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alan S BravermanDepartment of Urology, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19140, USA.
Ronald J Tallarida
Michael R Ruggieri
Temple University · US

Funding

Gastroesophageal Antireflux MechanismsR01DK079954 · NIDDK · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI MILLER, LARRY S, RUGGIERI, MICHAEL RAYMOND · 2010 to 2013
$1.3M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK079954
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Smooth muscle contains multiple muscarinic receptor subtypes, including M2 and M3. M2 receptors outnumber M3 receptors. Based on the potency of subtype selective anticholinergics, contraction is mediated by the M3 subtype. However, results from knockout (KO) mice show that the M2 receptor mediates approximately 45% of the contractile response produced by the M3 receptor. The traditional theory of one receptor mediating a response does not allow assessment of interactions between receptors when more than one receptor participates in a response. Our study was performed using a novel analysis method based on dual receptor occupancy to determine how M2 and M3 receptor subtypes interact to mediate contraction in mouse stomach. Cumulative carbachol concentration contractile responses were determined for wild-type, M2-KO, and M3-KO stomach body smooth muscle. Using affinity constants for carbachol at M2 and M3 cholinergic receptors, the concentration values were converted to fractional receptor occupation. The resulting occupation-effect relations showed maximum effects for the M2 and M3 subtypes, respectively. These occupation-effect relations allow determination of the additive (expected) isobole based on this dual occupancy, thereby providing a curve (mathematically derived) for comparison against the experimentally derived value in wild type. The actual values determined experimentally in the wild type were not statistically significantly different from that predicted by the isobole. This confirms that the interaction between these mutually occupied receptors is additive. The new method of analysis also expands the traditional Schild theory that was based on a single receptor type to which the agonist and antagonist bind.

Indexed as

AnimalsAtropineCarbacholCholinergic AgonistsIn Vitro TechniquesMiceMice, KnockoutMuscarinic AntagonistsMuscle ContractionPotassium ChlorideReceptor, Muscarinic M2Receptor, Muscarinic M3StomachAtropineCarbacholCholinergic AgonistsMuscarinic AntagonistsPotassium ChlorideReceptor, Muscarinic M2Receptor, Muscarinic M3

Identifiers

PMID18339971
PMCPMC3277794
OpenAlexW2167384732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.