Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18338127›Full record

ReviewLa Radiologia medica2008

MR spectroscopy of the breast.

F Sardanelli, A Fausto, F Podo

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in La Radiologia medica, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The potential of multiparametric MRI of the breast.The British journal of radiology · 2017
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Modern breast cancer detection: a technological review.International journal of biomedical imaging · 2009
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

F SardanelliUniversità degli Studi di Milano, Dipartimento di Scienze Medico-chirurgiche, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Servizio di Radiologia, San Donato Milanese, Milano, Italy. francesco.sardanelli@unimi.it
A Fausto
F Podo
IRCCS Policlinico San Donato · ITIstituto Superiore di Sanità · ITUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This literature review assesses the clinical potential of proton ((1)H) magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) of breast lesions. We here illustrate the basic principles of spectrum acquisition for volumes of interest, determined on the basis of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and of MRS postprocessing. We discuss the criteria for interpreting the spectrum with particular reference to the metabolic significance of the peak of total choline containing compounds at 3.2 ppm, a marker that is correlated with malignancy. We then summarise the findings obtained in lesion characterisation (with a possible gain in specificity with respect to dynamic MRI), the assessment of the effects of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and the correlation reported at high-field between the tumour tissue concentration of choline-containing compounds and the presence of lymph node metastases. Lastly, we outline the clinical use of this technique as the final phase of a complete breast MR examination after intravenous administration of paramagnetic contrast material for the dynamic study, with reference to its use by radiologists dedicated to breast imaging.

Indexed as

BreastBreast NeoplasmsCholineFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisMagnetic Resonance ImagingMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyNeoadjuvant TherapyCholine

Identifiers

PMID18338127
OpenAlexW1497668517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.