Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18337500›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2008

Genomic imprinting effects on adult body composition in mice.

James M Cheverud, Reinmar Hager, Charles Roseman, Gloria Fawcett, Bing Wang, Jason B Wolf

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Sexes on the brain: Sex as multiple biological variables in the neuronal control of feeding.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Molecular basis of disease · 2020
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Mapping complex traits as a dynamic system.Physics of life reviews · 2015
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

James M CheverudDepartment of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Reinmar Hager
Charles Roseman
Gloria Fawcett
Bing Wang
Jason B Wolf
Washington University in St. Louis · USUniversity of Manchester · GBUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · US

Funding

Genetics Basis of Dietary Obesity in MiceR01DK055736 · NIDDK · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI CHEVERUD, JAMES M · 2000 to 2009
$2.1M
GENETIC BASIS OF DIETARY OBESITY IN MICER56DK055736 · NIDDK · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI CHEVERUD, JAMES M · 2010 to 2010
$354k
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/C516936/1NIDDK NIH HHS DK055736NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK055736NIDDK NIH HHS R56 DK055736
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomic imprinting results in the differential expression of genes, depending on which allele is inherited from the mother and which from the father. The effects of such differential gene expression are reflected in phenotypic differences between the reciprocal heterozygotes (Aa vs. aA). Although many imprinted genes have been identified and play a key role in development, little is known about the contribution of imprinting to quantitative variation in trait expression. Here, we examine this problem by mapping imprinting effects on adult body composition traits in the F(3) generation of an intercross between the Large (LG/J) and Small (SM/J) inbred mouse strains. We identified eight pleiotropic imprinted quantitative trait loci (iQTL) located throughout the genome. Most iQTL are in novel locations that have not previously been associated with imprinting effects, but those on chromosomes 7, 12, and centromeric 18 lie in regions previously identified as containing imprinted genes. Our results show that the effects of genomic imprinting are relatively small, with reciprocal heterozygotes differing by approximately 0.25 standard deviation units and the effects at each locus accounting for 1% to 4% of the phenotypic variance. We detected a variety of imprinting patterns, with paternal expression being the most common. These results indicate that genomic imprinting has small, but detectable, effects on the normal variation of complex traits in adults and is likely to be more common than usually thought.

Indexed as

AgingAnimalsBody CompositionBody WeightFemaleGenomic ImprintingMaleMiceQuantitative Trait Loci

Identifiers

PMID18337500
PMCPMC2393747
OpenAlexW2152229757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.