Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18337449›Full record

ArticleMolecular cancer research : MCR2008

Epidermal growth factor receptor vIII expression in U87 glioblastoma cells alters their proteasome composition, function, and response to irradiation.

Kwanghee Kim, James M Brush, Philip A Watson, Nicholas A Cacalano, Keisuke S Iwamoto, William H McBride

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular cancer research : MCR, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Adaptation of the Tumor Antigen Presentation Machinery to Ionizing Radiation.Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Potential roles for PA28beta in gastric adenocarcinoma development and diagnosis.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2010
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Imaging of radiation effects on cellular 26S proteasome function in situ.International journal of radiation biology · 2009
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kwanghee KimDepartment of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1714, USA.
James M Brush
Philip A Watson
Nicholas A Cacalano
Keisuke S Iwamoto
William H McBride
University of California, Los Angeles · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · US

Funding

Radiation Affects Tumor Antigen PresentationR01CA101752 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI MCBRIDE, WILLIAM H. · 2003 to 2007
$1.7M
Effects of Heat and/or Radiation on Proteasome FunctionR01CA087887 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI MCBRIDE, WILLIAM H. · 2001 to 2004
$1.0M
NCI NIH HHS CA-87887NCI NIH HHS R01 CA087887NCI NIH HHS R01 CA101752
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Little is known about the factors that influence the proteasome structures in cells and their activity, although this could be highly relevant to cancer therapy. We have previously shown that, within minutes, irradiation inhibits substrate degradation by the 26S proteasome in most cell types. Here, we report an exception in U87 glioblastoma cells transduced to express the epidermal growth factor receptor vIII (EGFRvIII) mutant (U87EGFRvIII), which does not respond to irradiation with 26S proteasome inhibition. This was assessed using either a fluorogenic substrate or a reporter gene, the ornithine decarboxylase degron fused to ZsGreen (cODCZsGreen), which targets the protein to the 26S proteasome. To elucidate whether this was due to alterations in proteasome composition, we used quantitative reverse transcription-PCR to quantify the constitutive (X, Y, Z) and inducible 20S subunits (Lmp7, Lmp2, Mecl1), and 11S (PA28alpha and beta) and 19S components (PSMC1 and PSMD4). U87 and U87EGFRvIII significantly differed in expression of proteasome subunits, and in particular immunosubunits. Interestingly, 2 Gy irradiation of U87 increased subunit expression levels by 16% to 324% at 6 hours, with a coincident 30% decrease in levels of the proteasome substrate c-myc, whereas they changed little in U87EGFRvIII. Responses similar to 2 Gy were seen in U87 treated with a proteasome inhibitor, NPI0052, suggesting that proteasome inhibition induced replacement of subunits independent of the means of inhibition. Our data clearly indicate that the composition and function of the 26S proteasome can be changed by expression of the EGFRvIII. How this relates to the increased radioresistance associated with this cell line remains to be established.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticProteasome InhibitorsBrain NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorDNA PrimersErbB ReceptorsFlow CytometryGlioblastomaHumansMicroscopy, ConfocalProteasome Endopeptidase ComplexRecombinant Fusion ProteinsRetroviridaeReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionATP dependent 26S proteaseDNA Primersepidermal growth factor receptor VIIIErbB ReceptorsProteasome Endopeptidase ComplexProteasome InhibitorsRecombinant Fusion Proteins

Identifiers

PMID18337449
PMCPMC2877368
OpenAlexW2125680248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.