Trial reportBMC pregnancy and childbirth2007
The CORONIS Trial. International study of caesarean section surgical techniques: a randomised fractional, factorial trial.
Trial report in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Subcuticular Suture Versus Staples for Closure of the Skin After Caesarean Section: A Prospective Randomized Single-blinded Case-Control Study With the Case as it's Own Control.
Sharp Versus Blunt Fascial Incision at Caesarean Section: A Prospective Randomized Double-blinded Case-Control Study With the Case as it's Own Control.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.
- Closure versus non-closure of the peritoneum at caesarean section: short- and long-term outcomes.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014Pooled it
- Surgical techniques for uterine incision and uterine closure at the time of caesarean section.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014Pooled it
- Abdominal surgical incisions for caesarean section.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013Pooled it
- Techniques for caesarean section.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2008Pooled it
- Extra-abdominal versus intra-abdominal repair of the uterine incision at caesarean section.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2004Pooled it
- Uterine closure after cesarean delivery: surgical technique, biological rationale, and clinical implications.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2026Review
- Evidence-based medical procedures to optimise caesarean outcomes: an overview of systematic reviews.EClinicalMedicine · 2025Review
- Evidence-based surgical procedures to optimize caesarean outcomes: an overview of systematic reviews.EClinicalMedicine · 2024Review
- Intra-operative Guidelines for the Prevention of Uterine Niche Formation in Cesarean Sections: A Review.Cureus · 2023Review
- Uterine exteriorization versus intraperitoneal repair: effect on intraoperative nausea and vomiting during repeat cesarean delivery - A randomized clinical trial.Facts, views & vision in ObGyn · 2018Article
- Laparoscopic Management of Adhesions Developed after Peritoneal Nonclosure in Primary Cesarean Section Delivery.Obstetrics and gynecology international · 2018Article
- Why do niches develop in Caesarean uterine scars? Hypotheses on the aetiology of niche development.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2015Article
- Infectious morbidity after cesarean delivery: 10 strategies to reduce risk.Reviews in obstetrics & gynecology · 2012Article
- Neonatal mortality, risk factors and causes: a prospective population-based cohort study in urban Pakistan.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2009Article
- Caesarean Section Techniques among Senior Obstetricians in Nigeria: A Descriptive Multicentre Survey.Nigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical AssociationReview
- Comparison of intra operative hemorrhage by blunt and sharp expansion of uterine incision at cesarean section.Pakistan journal of medical sciencesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCaesarean section is one of the most commonly performed operations on women throughout the world. Rates have increased in recent years - about 20-25% in many developed countries. Rates in other parts of the world vary widely.A variety of surgical techniques for all elements of the caesarean section operation are in use. Many have not yet been rigorously evaluated in randomised controlled trials, and it is not known whether any are associated with better outcomes for women and babies. Because huge numbers of women undergo caesarean section, even small differences in post-operative morbidity rates between techniques could translate into improved health for substantial numbers of women, and significant cost savings.
designCORONIS is a multicentre, fractional, factorial randomised controlled trial and will be conducted in centres in Argentina, Ghana, India, Kenya, Pakistan and Sudan. Women are eligible if they are undergoing their first or second caesarean section through a transverse abdominal incision. Five comparisons will be carried out in one trial, using a 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 fractional factorial design. This design has rarely been used, but is appropriate for the evaluation of several procedures which will be used together in clinical practice. The interventions are:* Blunt versus sharp abdominal entry* Exteriorisation of the uterus for repair versus intra-abdominal repair* Single versus double layer closure of the uterus* Closure versus non-closure of the peritoneum (pelvic and parietal)* Chromic catgut versus Polyglactin-910 for uterine repairThe primary outcome is death or maternal infectious morbidity (one or more of the following: antibiotic use for maternal febrile morbidity during postnatal hospital stay, antibiotic use for endometritis, wound infection or peritonitis) or further operative procedures; or blood transfusion. The sample size required is 15,000 women in total; at least 7,586 women in each comparison. DISCUSSION: Improvements in health from optimising caesarean section techniques are likely to be more significant in developing countries, because the rates of postoperative morbidity in these countries tend to be higher. More women could therefore benefit from improvements in techniques.
trial registrationThe CORONIS Trial is registered in the Current Controlled Trials registry. ISCRTN31089967.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.