Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18336206›Full record

ReviewCombinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening2008

A decade of yeast surface display technology: where are we now?

Lauren R Pepper, Yong Ku Cho, Eric T Boder, Eric V Shusta

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Combinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 80 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
80citing papers in PubMed
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

80 citing papers in PubMed, 182 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. EngineeringMicroorganisms · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Review
  19. Engineering Proteins Containing Noncanonical Amino Acids on the Yeast Surface.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  20. Article

20 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lauren R PepperDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1415 Engineering Drive, Madison, WI 53706, USA.
Yong Ku Cho
Eric T Boder
Eric V Shusta
University of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

Institutional Training in the Genomic SciencesT32HG002760 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Qiongshi Lu · 2003 to 2026
$17.7M
Membrane Proteomics of the Blood-Brain BarrierR01NS052649 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI SHUSTA, ERIC V · 2006 to 2009
$1.3M
NHGRI NIH HHS 5T32HG002760NHGRI NIH HHS T32 HG002760NINDS NIH HHS NS052649NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS052649
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Yeast surface display has become an increasingly popular tool for protein engineering and library screening applications. Recent advances have greatly expanded the capability of yeast surface display, and are highlighted by cell-based selections, epitope mapping, cDNA library screening, and cell adhesion engineering. In this review, we discuss the state-of-the-art yeast display methodologies and the rapidly expanding set of applications afforded by this technology.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell Adhesion MoleculesDNA, ComplementaryEpitope MappingHumansProtein EngineeringSaccharomyces cerevisiaeCell Adhesion MoleculesDNA, Complementary

Identifiers

PMID18336206
PMCPMC2681324
OpenAlexW2151759421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.