Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18336052›Full record

ReviewClinical pharmacokinetics2008

Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of desloratadine, fexofenadine and levocetirizine : a comparative review.

Philippe Devillier, Nicolas Roche, Christophe Faisy

Abstract readComparative StudyReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 93 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. H1-antihistamines for chronic spontaneous urticaria.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Population pharmacokinetic analysis of fexofenadine in Japanese pediatric patients.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2014
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. MRGPRX2 Mediates Mast Cell-Induced Endometriosis Pain Through the Sensitization of Sensory Neurons via Histamine/HRH1/TRPV1 Signaling Pathway.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2025
    Article
  8. A Mechanistic Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling approach for fexofenadine: predictive pharmacokinetic insights in humans.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Calcium and Neural Stem Cell Proliferation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The World Allergy Organization journal · 2022
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Philippe DevillierLaboratory of Pharmacology, UPRES EA 220, Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin, Hôpital Foch, Suresnes, France. p.devillier@hopital-foch.org
Nicolas Roche
Christophe Faisy
Hôpital Foch · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Second-generation histamine H(1) receptor antagonists were developed to provide efficacious treatment of allergic rhinitis (AR) and chronic idiopathic urticaria (CIU) while decreasing adverse effects associated with first-generation agents. When comparing the efficacy and safety profiles of the newest second-generation antihistamines - desloratadine, fexofenadine and levocetirizine - many pharmacological and clinical criteria must be considered. Most importantly, these elements should not be evaluated separately but, rather, as parts of a puzzle that create a whole picture. As a class, second-generation antihistamines are highly selective for the H(1) receptor. Some bind to it with high affinity, although there is marked heterogeneity among the various compounds. They have a limited effect on the CNS, and clinical studies have noted almost no significant drug-drug interactions in the agents studied. No major cytochrome P450 inhibition has been reported with desloratadine, fexofenadine and levocetirizine, and the bioavailability of desloratadine is minimally affected by drugs interfering with transporter molecules. Of the second-generation antihistamines, desloratadine has the greatest binding affinity for the H(1) receptor. The use of desloratadine, fexofenadine and levocetirizine is not associated with clinically relevant antimuscarinic effects. Desloratadine and fexofenadine do not impair cognitive or psychomotor functioning and are comparable with placebo in terms of somnolence. Based on these pharmacological characteristics, as well as clinical endpoints such as symptom scores, quality-of-life surveys, inflammatory cell counts and investigators' global evaluations, we conclude that desloratadine, fexofenadine and levocetirizine are all efficacious treatments for AR and CIU. However, differences among the antihistamines in relation to a lack of significant interaction with drug transporter molecules and somnolence in excess of placebo may provide some advantages for the overall profile of desloratadine compared with fexofenadine and levocetirizine.

Indexed as

CetirizineDrug InteractionsHistamine H1 Antagonists, Non-SedatingHumansLoratadineRhinitis, Allergic, PerennialRhinitis, Allergic, SeasonalTerfenadineUrticariaCetirizinedesloratadinefexofenadineHistamine H1 Antagonists, Non-SedatinglevocetirizineLoratadineTerfenadine

Identifiers

PMID18336052
OpenAlexW2007432411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.