Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18332402›Full record

ArticleAnnals of family medicine

What patients want from primary care consultations: a discrete choice experiment to identify patients' priorities.

Sudeh Cheraghi-Sohi, Arne Risa Hole, Nicola Mead, Ruth McDonald, Diane Whalley, Peter Bower, Martin Roland

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of family medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 125 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
125citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

125 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Primary medical care continuity and patient mortality: a systematic review.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2020
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. The Role of Qualitative Research Methods in Discrete Choice Experiments.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2017
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. What do patients and clinicians think about continuity in general practice in England? a qualitative study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Study on edge villages based on cross-region healthcare-seeking behavior.International journal of health geographics · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Task Shifting, eHealth and Shared Decision-Making-Preference Heterogeneity in the Adult Population for Developments in Outpatient Primary Healthcare.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  20. Article

65 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sudeh Cheraghi-SohiNational Primary Care Research and Development Centre (NPCRDC), University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Arne Risa Hole
Nicola Mead
Ruth McDonald
Diane Whalley
Peter Bower
Martin Roland

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe consultation is fundamental to the delivery of primary care, but different ways of organizing consultations may lead to different patient experiences in terms of access, continuity, technical quality of care, and communication. Patients' priorities for these different issues need to be understood, but the optimal methods for assessing priorities are unclear. This study used a discrete choice experiment to assess patients' priorities.

methodsWe surveyed patients from 6 family practices in England. The patients chose between primary care consultations differing in attributes such as ease of access (wait for an appointment), choice (flexibility of appointment times), continuity (physician's knowledge of the patient), technical quality (thoroughness of physical examination), and multiple aspects of patient-centered care (interest in patient's ideas, inquiry about patient's social and emotional well-being, and involvement of patient in decision making). We used probit models to assess the relative priority patients placed on different attributes and to estimate how much they were willing to pay for them.

resultsAnalyses were based on responses from 1,193 patients (a 53% response rate). Overall, patients were willing to pay the most for a thorough physical examination ($40.87). The next most valued attributes of care were seeing a physician who knew them well ($12.18), seeing a physician with a friendly manner ($8.50), having a reduction in waiting time of 1 day ($7.22), and having flexibility of appointment times ($6.71). Patients placed similar value on the different aspects of patient-centered care ($12.06-$14.82). Responses were influenced by the scenario in which the decision was made (minor physical problem vs urgent physical problem vs ambiguous physical or psychological problem) and by patients' demographic characteristics.

conclusionsAlthough patient-centered care is important to patients, they may place higher priority on the technical quality of care and continuity of care. Discrete choice experiments may be a useful method for assessing patients' priorities in health care.

Indexed as

Patient SatisfactionPrimary Health CareAdolescentAdultAgedAppointments and SchedulesChoice BehaviorEnglandFamily PracticeHealth ExpendituresHumansMiddle AgedPatient-Centered CarePatient ParticipationPhysician-Patient RelationsQuality of Health Care

Identifiers

PMID18332402
PMCPMC2267425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.