Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18327647›Full record

ReviewGenetica2008

Selfish genetic elements and sexual selection: their impact on male fertility.

Tom A R Price, Nina Wedell

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Genetica, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
9.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A selfish supergene causes meiotic drive through both sexes inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Molecular Mechanisms and Evolutionary Consequences of Spore Killers in Ascomycetes.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2021
    Review
  6. Selfish genetic elements and male fertility.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Ancient gene drives: an evolutionary paradox.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2019
    Article
  9. Fitness consequences of a non-recombiningProceedings. Biological sciences · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Acculturation drives the evolution of intergroup conflict.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  14. Fertility Costs of Meiotic Drivers.Current biology : CB · 2019
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Genetic Villains: Killer Meiotic Drivers.Trends in genetics : TIG · 2018
    Review
  19. Sexual selection modulates genetic conflicts and patterns of genomic imprinting.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2017
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tom A R PriceSchool of Biosciences, University of Exeter, Cornwall Campus, Penryn, UK. Tom.Price@Exeter.ac.uk
Nina Wedell
University of Exeter · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Females of many species mate with more than one male (polyandry), yet the adaptive significance of polyandry is poorly understood. One hypothesis to explain the widespread occurrence of multiple mating is that it may allow females to utilize post-copulatory mechanisms to reduce the risk of fertilizing their eggs with sperm from incompatible males. Selfish genetic elements (SGEs) are ubiquitous in eukaryotes, frequent sources of reproductive incompatibilities, and associated with fitness costs. However, their impact on sexual selection is largely unexplored. In this review we examine the link between SGEs, male fertility and sperm competitive ability. We show there is widespread evidence that SGEs are associated with reduced fertility in both animals and plants, and present some recent data showing that males carrying SGEs have reduced paternity in sperm competition. We also discuss possible reasons why male gametes are particularly vulnerable to the selfish actions of SGEs. The widespread reduction in male fertility caused by SGEs implies polyandry may be a successful female strategy to bias paternity against SGE-carrying males.

Indexed as

Selection, GeneticAnimalsFemaleFertilityHumansMalePlantsReproductionSexual Behavior, AnimalSpermatozoa

Identifiers

PMID18327647
OpenAlexW1977783879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.