Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18327562›Full record

ArticleDer Internist2008

[Medical therapy of urinary tract infection].

G Stein, R Fünfstück

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Internist, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [Urinary tract infections].Der Internist · 2011
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

G SteinKlinikum der Friedrich-Schiller-Universität, Erlanger Allee 101, 07740, Jena, Germany. guenter.stein@med.uni-jena.de
R Fünfstück
Friedrich Schiller University Jena · DESophien-und Hufeland Klinikum · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urinary tract infections (UTI) are the most common bacterial infectious diseases seen in the community, in most cases caused by E. coli. The treatment strategy differs depending on localization (lower vs. upper UT), acute uncomplicated vs. complicated infection, as well as for chronic disease and asymptomatic bacteriuria, the known or susceptible causative uropathogen with the (local) resistance pattern and the morbidity of the patient. There is a considerable worrying increase in the resistance rate of E. coli to TMP/SMX, quinolones and others. Most patients with uncomplicated, in the community acquired UTI are treated safely and effectively as out-patients. The available data support a short-course therapy with 3 days as the current standard therapy for lower UTI, but with a 7-14 days treatment for upper and complicated UTI. Recurrent UTI is best managed by low-dose antimicrobial prophylaxis for 3-6 (12 ore more) months. Besides that, new approaches to preventive strategies must prove their value in specific patient groups.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAge FactorsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriuriaCombined Modality TherapyCross InfectionEscherichia coli InfectionsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPregnancyRisk FactorsSecondary PreventionSex FactorsAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID18327562
OpenAlexW2015074685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.