Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18327244›Full record

GuidelineNature biotechnology2008

Minimum information specification for in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry experiments (MISFISHIE).

Eric W Deutsch, Catherine A Ball, Jules J Berman, G Steven Bova, Alvis Brazma, Roger E Bumgarner, David Campbell, Helen C Causton, Jeffrey H Christiansen, Fabrice Daian and 30 more

Abstract readGuideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in Nature biotechnology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. A Practical Guide to Reproducible Modeling for Biochemical Networks.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Use of multicolor fluorescence in situ hybridization to detect deletions in clinical tissue sections.Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology · 2018
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

40 authors.

Eric W DeutschInstitute for Systems Biology, 1441 N 34th Street, Seattle, Washington 98103, USA.
Catherine A Ball
Jules J Berman
G Steven Bova
Alvis Brazma
Roger E Bumgarner
David Campbell
Helen C Causton
Jeffrey H Christiansen
Fabrice Daian
Delphine Dauga
Duncan R Davidson
Gregory Gimenez
Young Ah Goo
Sean Grimmond
Thorsten Henrich
Bernhard G Herrmann
Michael H Johnson
Martin Korb
Jason C Mills
Asa J Oudes
Helen E Parkinson
Laura E Pascal
Nicolas Pollet
John Quackenbush
Mirana Ramialison
Martin Ringwald
David Salgado
Susanna-Assunta Sansone
Gavin Sherlock
Christian J Stoeckert
Jason Swedlow
Ronald C Taylor
Laura Walashek
Anthony Warford
David G Wilkinson
Yi Zhou
Leonard I Zon
Alvin Y Liu
Lawrence D True

Funding

Gastric and intestinal epithelial progenitor cell GAPU01DK063483 · NIDDK · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI GORDON, JEFFREY IVAN · 2002 to 2004
$4.1M
Global Genomic Analyses of Human HematopoiesisU01DK063481 · NIDDK · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI LEMISCHKA, IHOR R · 2002 to 2004
$3.2M
Comparative Approach to the Hematopoietic Stem CellU01DK063328 · NIDDK · CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL BOSTON · PI ZON, LEONARD IRA · 2002 to 2004
$3.0M
Towards renal regenerationR01DK063400 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND · PI LITTLE, MELISSA HELEN · 2002 to 2004
$2.4M
Urologic Epithelial Stem CellsU01DK063630 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI LIU, ALVIN Y · 2002 to 2004
$2.4M
A Comprehensive System for Microarray Data AnalysisR33HL073712 · NHLBI · INSTITUTE FOR GENOMIC RESEARCH · PI QUACKENBUSH, JOHN · 2002 to 2004
$1.7M
MOLECULAR REGULATION OF GASTRIC CHIEF (ZYMOGENIC) CELL DIFFERENTIATIONR01DK079798 · NIDDK · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI MILLS, JASON C · 2008 to 2012
$1.6M
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/E025080/1Medical Research Council MC_U117532048Medical Research Council MC_U127527203NHLBI NIH HHS R33 HL073712NIDDK NIH HHS DK63328NIDDK NIH HHS DK63400NIDDK NIH HHS DK63481NIDDK NIH HHS DK63483NIDDK NIH HHS DK63630NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK063400NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK079798NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK063328NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK063481NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK063483NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK063630
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One purpose of the biomedical literature is to report results in sufficient detail that the methods of data collection and analysis can be independently replicated and verified. Here we present reporting guidelines for gene expression localization experiments: the minimum information specification for in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry experiments (MISFISHIE). MISFISHIE is modeled after the Minimum Information About a Microarray Experiment (MIAME) specification for microarray experiments. Both guidelines define what information should be reported without dictating a format for encoding that information. MISFISHIE describes six types of information to be provided for each experiment: experimental design, biomaterials and treatments, reporters, staining, imaging data and image characterizations. This specification has benefited the consortium within which it was developed and is expected to benefit the wider research community. We welcome feedback from the scientific community to help improve our proposal.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyGene Expression ProfilingImmunohistochemistryIn Situ Hybridization

Identifiers

PMID18327244
PMCPMC4367930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.