Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18326961›Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)2008

Electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy regression induced by an angiotensin receptor blocker-based regimen in hypertensive patients with the metabolic syndrome: data from the SARA Study.

Carlos Escobar, Vivencio Barrios, Alberto Calderón, Sara Barrios, Rocio Echarri, Josefa Navarro-Cid, Elena Ferrer, Raúl Fernandez

Abstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Carlos EscobarDepartment of Cardiology, Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Carretera Colmenar km 9.100, Madrid, Spain.
Vivencio Barrios
Alberto Calderón
Sara Barrios
Rocio Echarri
Josefa Navarro-Cid
Elena Ferrer
Raúl Fernandez

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The authors assessed the effect of an angiotensin receptor blocker (candesartan)-based regimen on electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy (ECG-LVH) in 276 patients with hypertension, including 141 with the metabolic syndrome (MS). Baseline blood pressure (BP) and ECG-LVH parameters did not differ in patients with and without MS. At the study's end, BP had decreased similarly in both groups. At baseline, 26.1% of patients with MS and 24.7% without MS exhibited ECG-LVH by Cornell product (CorP) criteria (P=NS); 26.8% and 17.2%, respectively, by Sokolow-Lyon product (SokP) (P=.01); 11.4%and 11.8% by Cornell voltage (CorV) (P=NS); and 12.4% and 6.5% by Sokolow-Lyon voltage (SokV) (P=.01). At the study's end, in the MS group, prevalence of ECG-LVH was reduced to 19.5% from 26.1% (P=.001), to 8.5% from 11.4% (P=.01), and to 24.4% from 26.8%(P=.03) by CorP, CorV, and SokP, respectively. In patients without MS, only the CorP criterion showed a significant decrease in ECG-LVH prevalence, declining to 20.5% (P=.01). The relative risk reduction of ECG-LVH was higher in patients with MS according to CorV and SokP criteria (P<.01).

Indexed as

AdultAgedAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsBenzimidazolesBiphenyl CompoundsBlood PressureDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Therapy, CombinationElectrocardiographyFemaleHumansHypertensionHypertrophy, Left VentricularMaleMetabolic SyndromeMiddle AgedAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsBenzimidazolesBiphenyl CompoundscandesartanTetrazoles

Identifiers

PMID18326961
PMCPMC8109867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.