Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18325110›Full record

ArticleBMC microbiology2008

Survey of bacterial diversity in chronic wounds using pyrosequencing, DGGE, and full ribosome shotgun sequencing.

Scot E Dowd, Yan Sun, Patrick R Secor, Daniel D Rhoads, Benjamin M Wolcott, Garth A James, Randall D Wolcott

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC microbiology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 328 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
328citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

328 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Antibiotics and antiseptics for pressure ulcers.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. A quorum-sensing molecule fromProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. IDCases · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Hidden highways: fungi associated with glossiphoniid leeches.International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

268 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Scot E DowdUnited States Department of Agriculture ARS Livestock Issues Research Unit, Lubbock, TX, USA. sdowd@lbk.ars.usda.gov
Yan Sun
Patrick R Secor
Daniel D Rhoads
Benjamin M Wolcott
Garth A James
Randall D Wolcott

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChronic wound pathogenic biofilms are host-pathogen environments that colonize and exist as a cohabitation of many bacterial species. These bacterial populations cooperate to promote their own survival and the chronic nature of the infection. Few studies have performed extensive surveys of the bacterial populations that occur within different types of chronic wound biofilms. The use of 3 separate16S-based molecular amplifications followed by pyrosequencing, shotgun Sanger sequencing, and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis were utilized to survey the major populations of bacteria that occur in the pathogenic biofilms of three types of chronic wound types: diabetic foot ulcers (D), venous leg ulcers (V), and pressure ulcers (P).

resultsThere are specific major populations of bacteria that were evident in the biofilms of all chronic wound types, including Staphylococcus, Pseudomonas, Peptoniphilus, Enterobacter, Stenotrophomonas, Finegoldia, and Serratia spp. Each of the wound types reveals marked differences in bacterial populations, such as pressure ulcers in which 62% of the populations were identified as obligate anaerobes. There were also populations of bacteria that were identified but not recognized as wound pathogens, such as Abiotrophia para-adiacens and Rhodopseudomonas spp. Results of molecular analyses were also compared to those obtained using traditional culture-based diagnostics. Only in one wound type did culture methods correctly identify the primary bacterial population indicating the need for improved diagnostic methods.

conclusionIf clinicians can gain a better understanding of the wound's microbiota, it will give them a greater understanding of the wound's ecology and will allow them to better manage healing of the wound improving the prognosis of patients. This research highlights the necessity to begin evaluating, studying, and treating chronic wound pathogenic biofilms as multi-species entities in order to improve the outcomes of patients. This survey will also foster the pioneering and development of new molecular diagnostic tools, which can be used to identify the community compositions of chronic wound pathogenic biofilms and other medical biofilm infections.

Indexed as

Bacteria, AnaerobicBacterial InfectionsBacteriological TechniquesBiofilmsChronic DiseaseDiabetic FootDNA, BacterialGram-Negative BacteriaGram-Positive BacteriaHumansPressure UlcerVaricose UlcerDNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID18325110
PMCPMC2289825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.