Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18323808›Full record

ArticleNature protocols2008

Selective isolation of genomic loci from complex genomes by transformation-associated recombination cloning in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Natalay Kouprina, Vladimir Larionov

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature protocols, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 135 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
135citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

135 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The design and engineering of synthetic genomes.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2025
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Genetic engineering in diatoms: advances and prospects.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2025
    Review
  20. Article

75 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Natalay KouprinaLaboratory of Molecular Pharmacology, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA. kouprinn@mail.nih.gov
Vladimir Larionov

Funding

Study of hereditary prostate cancer and human artificial chromosomesZIABC010413 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI LARIONOV, VLADIMIR · 2009 to 2025
$31.5M
Study of hereditary prostate cancer and human artificial chromosomesZ01BC010413 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI LARIONOV, VLADIMIR · 2000 to 2008
$2.4M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Here, we describe a protocol for the selective isolation of any genomic fragment or gene of interest up to 250 kb in size from complex genomes as a circular yeast artificial chromosome (YAC). The method is based on transformation-associated recombination (TAR) in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae between genomic DNA and a linearized TAR cloning vector containing targeting sequences homologous to a region of interest. Recombination between the vector and homologous sequences in the co-transformed mammalian DNA results in the establishment of a YAC that is able to propagate, segregate and be selected for in yeast. Yield of gene-positive clones varies from 1% to 5%. The entire procedure takes 2 weeks to complete once the TAR vector is constructed and genomic DNA is prepared. The TAR cloning method has a broad application in functional and comparative genomics, long-range haplotyping and characterization of chromosomal rearrangements, including copy number variations.

Indexed as

AnimalsChromosomes, Artificial, YeastCloning, MolecularDNA, CircularGenetic VectorsGenomeGenomicsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeTransformation, GeneticDNA, Circular

Identifiers

PMID18323808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.