Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18323549›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2008

Use of different postmenopausal hormone therapies and risk of histology- and hormone receptor-defined invasive breast cancer.

Agnès Fournier, Alban Fabre, Sylvie Mesrine, Marie-Christine Boutron-Ruault, Franco Berrino, Françoise Clavel-Chapelon

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03285230 (The French E3N Prospective Cohort Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 43 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
9.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03285230 active not recruitingnot on this map

The French E3N Prospective Cohort Study (Etude Epidémiologique auprès de Femmes de la Mutuelle Générale de l'Education Nationale)

TypeobservationalSponsorInstitut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, FranceRan1990 to 2046Enrolled100,000ConditionsBreast Cancer, Colo-rectal Cancer, Parkinson Disease, Asthma
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 179 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Treating menopause - MHT and beyond.Nature reviews. Endocrinology · 2022
    Review
  10. The Role of Progesterone Receptors in Breast Cancer.Drug design, development and therapy · 2022
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Agnès FournierInstitut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, ERI 20, EA 4045, Institut Gustave Roussy, 94805 Villejuif Cedex, France.
Alban Fabre
Sylvie Mesrine
Marie-Christine Boutron-Ruault
Franco Berrino
Françoise Clavel-Chapelon
Institut Gustave Roussy · FRInserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe previously found that the risk of invasive breast cancer varied according to the progestagen component of combined postmenopausal hormone therapy (CHT): progesterone, dydrogesterone, or other progestagens. We conducted the present study to assess how these CHTs were associated with histology- and hormone receptor-defined breast cancer. PATIENTS AND

methodsWe used data from the French E3N cohort study, with 80,391 postmenopausal women followed for a mean duration of 8.1 years; 2,265 histologically confirmed invasive breast cancers were identified through biennial self-administered questionnaires completed from 1990 to 2002. The relative risks (RRs) were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models.

resultsCompared with postmenopausal hormone therapy (HT) never-use, ever-use of estrogen+progesterone was not significantly associated with the risk of any breast cancer subtype, but increasing duration of estrogen+progesterone was associated with increasing risks of lobular (P = .06) and estrogen receptor-positive/progesterone receptor-negative (ER+/PR-; P = .02). Estrogen+dydrogesterone was associated with a significant increase in risk of lobular carcinoma (RR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.1 to 2.6). Estrogen+other progestagens was associated with significant increases in risk of ductal and lobular carcinomas (RR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.3 to 1.8; and 2.0; 95% CI, 1.5 to 2.7, respectively), of ER+/PR+ and ER+/PR- carcinomas (RR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.5 to 2.1; and 2.6; 95% CI, 1.9 to 3.5, respectively), but not of ER-/PR+ or ER-/PR- carcinomas (RR, 1.0; 95% CI, 0.5 to 2.1; and 1.4; 95% CI, 0.9 to 2.0, respectively).

conclusionThe increase in risk of breast cancer observed with the use of CHTs other than estrogen+progesterone and estrogen+dydrogesterone seems to apply preferentially to ER+ carcinomas, especially those ER+/PR-, and to affect both ductal and lobular carcinomas.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ductal, BreastCarcinoma, LobularCohort StudiesDydrogesteroneEstrogensFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPostmenopauseProgesteroneProgestinsReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneDydrogesteroneEstrogensProgesteroneProgestinsReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, Progesterone

Identifiers

PMID18323549
PMCPMC2346534
OpenAlexW2124383610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.