SynthesisBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2008
Treatment of human brucellosis: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
Synthesis in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 92 papers, 11 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
92 citing papers in PubMed, 11 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 292 citations in OpenAlex.
- Research mapping and comparative assessment of drug treatment regimens for brucellosis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Pooled it
- Updated therapeutic options for human brucellosis: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2024Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of therapeutic strategies for human brucellosis: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2024Pooled it
- Prevalence of Brucella melitensis and Brucella abortus aminoglycoside-resistant isolates: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2024Pooled it
- Better efficacy of triple antibiotics therapy for human brucellosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2023Pooled it
- Prevalence, diagnosis, and manifestations of brucellosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2022Pooled it
- Rifampicin versus streptomycin for brucellosis treatment in humans: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.PloS one · 2018Pooled it
- Antibiotics for treating human brucellosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012Pooled it
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials in the treatment of human brucellosis.PloS one · 2012Pooled it
- The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration.PLoS medicine · 2009Guideline
- The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2009Guideline
- Clinical and laboratory characteristics of human brucellosis and predictors of focal involvement: a retrospective cohort study from Türkiye.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Observational
- Brucellosis Surveillance - United States, 2010-2024.Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Surveillance summaries (Washington, D.C. : 2002) · 2026Article
- RETRACTED: Brucella melitensis infection with osteoarticular involvement: First reported cases in Colombia. https://doi.org/10.7705/biomedica.8614Biomedica : revista del Instituto Nacional de Salud · 2026Article
- Endovascular aneurysm repair combined with local and systemic antibacterial treatment for infected aorto-iliac artery aneurysms caused by Brucella.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Cervical brucellar spondylitis: Current management strategies and future directions.Infectious medicine · 2026Review
- Retrospective Analysis of Epidemiologic, Clinical, and Laboratory Findings of Patients Diagnosed with Brucellosis and Review of the Literature.Infectious diseases & clinical microbiology · 2026Article
- Unilateral septic sacroiliitis caused byIDCases · 2026Article
- Brucella Infection of the Sternoclavicular Joint with Innovative Localized Drug Delivery: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.Orthopedic research and reviews · 2026Article
- Article
32 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo determine and quantify differences in efficacy between treatment regimens for brucellosis.
designSystematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials assessing different antibiotic regimens and durations of treatment for human brucellosis. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, CENTRAL, Lilacs, conference proceedings, and bibliographies with no restrictions on language, study year, or publication status. Review methods Search, application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, data extraction, and assessment of methodological quality independently performed in duplicate. Primary outcomes were relapse and overall failure resulting from primary failure or relapse. Relative risks with 95% confidence intervals were calculated and pooled with a fixed effect model.
results30 trials and 77 treatment arms were included. Overall failure was significantly higher with doxycycline-rifampicin compared to doxycycline-streptomycin, mainly due to a higher rate of relapse (relative risk 2.80, 95% confidence interval 1.81 to 4.36; 13 trials, without heterogeneity). Results were consistent among patients with bacteraemia and complicated brucellosis. Doxycycline-streptomycin resulted in a significantly higher rate of failure than doxycycline-rifampicin-aminoglycoside (triple drug regimen) (2.50, 1.26 to 5.00; two trials). Gentamicin was not inferior to streptomycin (1.45, 0.52 to 4.00 for failure; two trials). Quinolones combined with rifampicin were significantly less effective than doxycycline combined with rifampicin or streptomycin (1.83, 1.11 to 3.02, for failure; five trials). Monotherapy was associated with a higher risk of failure than combined treatment when administered for a similar duration (2.56, 1.55 to 4.23; five trials). Treatment for six weeks or more offered an advantage over shorter treatment durations.
conclusionsThere are significant differences in effectiveness between currently recommended treatment regimens for brucellosis. The preferred treatment should be with dual or triple regimens including an aminoglycoside.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.