Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18321821›Full record

ArticleClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2008

The clinical significance of lymph node micrometastasis in stage I and stage II colorectal cancer.

Mark Davies, Ponnandai J Arumugam, Varsha I Shah, Alun Watkins, Andrew Roger Morgan, Nicholas D Carr, John Beynon

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Biomarkers in Colorectal Cancer: Current Research and Future Prospects.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Assessment of lymph node involvement in colorectal cancer.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2016
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mark DaviesDepartment of Colorectal Surgery and Pathology, Singleton Hospital, Sketty, Swansea SA2 8QA,Wales, UK.
Ponnandai J Arumugam
Varsha I Shah
Alun Watkins
Andrew Roger Morgan
Nicholas D Carr
John Beynon

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimRecent advances in immunohistochemical techniques have made it possible to identify micrometastasis using antibodies to cytokeratins (CK). The aim of the study was to determine the prevalence and prognostic significance of immunohistochemically detected micrometastasis (IHM) in patients with localised colorectal cancer (CRC) (Dukes' A and B). A further aim was to study the prognostic role of histopathological factors such as vascular invasion.

methodsThe original histology of 168 consecutive patients with Dukes' A or B tumours who had undergone curative resection was reviewed. Immunohistochemical staining was performed using CK antibodies, AE1/AE3 and MNF116 on all (n=898) lymph nodes. Survival analysis was performed on 105 cases that had been followed up until death or for at least 5 years.

resultsIHM were detected in 17.3% of lymph nodes analysed. Adverse outcome (death/local recurrence) was recorded in 8/49 (16%) patients with IHD-positive nodes and in 10/56 (18%) patients negative for IHM. IHM was not associated with adverse outcome on either univariate (p=0.540) or multivariate analyses (p=0.673). There was no correlation of IHM with age, gender, site, size and grade of tumour, depth of tumour invasion or perineural and vascular invasion. Vascular invasion was the only independent prognostic factor identified. DISCUSSION: We have shown that isolated CK-positive epithelioid cells are commonly found in morphologically benign pericolic lymph nodes of patients with localised (Dukes' A or B) CRC. These cells may represent occult micrometastasis but are not clinically significant. Vascular invasion identifies patients with localised CRC likely to develop recurrences or die of disease.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleHumansKeratinsLymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingPrognosisBiomarkers, TumorKeratins

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.