Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18321386›Full record

ArticleImplementation science : IS2008

A group randomized trial of a complexity-based organizational intervention to improve risk factors for diabetes complications in primary care settings: study protocol.

Michael L Parchman, Jacqueline A Pugh, Steven D Culler, Polly H Noel, Nedal H Arar, Raquel L Romero, Raymond F Palmer

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science : IS, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00482768 (Improving Risk Factors for Diabetes Complications in Primary Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00482768 nacompletednot on this map

Improving Risk Factors for Diabetes Complications in Primary Care

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San AntonioRan2007 to 2013Enrolled2,493ConditionsType 2 DiabetesArmsPractice Facilitation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Patient Experience in an Era of Primary Care Transformation: Revisiting the PACIC.European journal for person centered healthcare · 2016
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Michael L ParchmanVERDICT Health Services Research Center, South Texas Veterans Health Care System, San Antonio, TX, USA. parchman@uthscsa.edu
Jacqueline A Pugh
Steven D Culler
Polly H Noel
Nedal H Arar
Raquel L Romero
Raymond F Palmer
The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio · USSouth Texas Veterans Health Care System · USEmory University · US

Funding

Improving Risk Factors for Diabetes Complications in Primary CareR18DK075692 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI NOEL, POLLY H · 2007 to 2011
$2.5M
NIDDK NIH HHS R18 DK075692
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMost patients with type 2 diabetes have suboptimal control of their glucose, blood pressure (BP), and lipids - three risk factors for diabetes complications. Although the chronic care model (CCM) provides a roadmap for improving these outcomes, developing theoretically sound implementation strategies that will work across diverse primary care settings has been challenging. One explanation for this difficulty may be that most strategies do not account for the complex adaptive system (CAS) characteristics of the primary care setting. A CAS is comprised of individuals who can learn, interconnect, self-organize, and interact with their environment in a way that demonstrates non-linear dynamic behavior. One implementation strategy that may be used to leverage these properties is practice facilitation (PF). PF creates time for learning and reflection by members of the team in each clinic, improves their communication, and promotes an individualized approach to implement a strategy to improve patient outcomes. SPECIFIC

objectivesThe specific objectives of this protocol are to: evaluate the effectiveness and sustainability of PF to improve risk factor control in patients with type 2 diabetes across a variety of primary care settings; assess the implementation of the CCM in response to the intervention; examine the relationship between communication within the practice team and the implementation of the CCM; and determine the cost of the intervention both from the perspective of the organization conducting the PF intervention and from the perspective of the primary care practice.

interventionThe study will be a group randomized trial conducted in 40 primary care clinics. Data will be collected on all clinics, with 60 patients in each clinic, using a multi-method assessment process at baseline, 12, and 24 months. The intervention, PF, will consist of a series of practice improvement team meetings led by trained facilitators over 12 months. Primary hypotheses will be tested with 12-month outcome data. Sustainability of the intervention will be tested using 24 month data. Insights gained will be included in a delayed intervention conducted in control practices and evaluated in a pre-post design. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES: To test hypotheses, the unit of randomization will be the clinic. The unit of analysis will be the repeated measure of each risk factor for each patient, nested within the clinic. The repeated measure of glycosylated hemoglobin A1c will be the primary outcome, with BP and Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol as secondary outcomes. To study change in risk factor level, a hierarchical or random effect model will be used to account for the nesting of repeated measurement of risk factor within patients and patients within clinics.

Identifiers

PMID18321386
PMCPMC2291070
OpenAlexW2116009424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.