ArticleIntensive care medicine2008
Influence of insertion site on central venous catheter colonization and bloodstream infection rates.
Article in Intensive care medicine, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Central venous access sites for the prevention of venous thrombosis, stenosis and infection.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012Pooled it
- Article
- Practice guideline on the prevention and treatment of central line-associated bloodstream infection: Part 1--Diagnosis and prevention.Journal of intensive medicine · 2026Article
- Temporal and anatomic determinants of central-line-associated bloodstream infection risk in a tertiary PICU: a 3-year time-to-event and competing-risk analysis.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- MDR Bacteremia in the Critically Ill During COVID-19: The MARTINI Study.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Observational
- Emergency Department Placed Central Lines for Trauma Patients: A Retrospective Case-Control Study on Central Line-Associated Blood Stream Infection Risk From Central Lines Placed Emergently in the Emergency Department.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2025Article
- Sex-Disaggregated Analysis of Central Venous Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infections in Patients with Cancer.Oncology research and treatment · 2025Article
- Central venous catheter-related infection: does insertion site still matter? A French multicentric cohort study.Intensive care medicine · 2024Article
- Sites of blood collection and topical disinfectants associated with contaminated cultures: An ambidirectional cohort study.Journal of general and family medicine · 2024Article
- Sustained low catheter related infection (CRI) incidence in an observational follow-up study of 9924 catheters using automated data scripts as quality assurance for central venous catheter (CVC) management.Infection prevention in practice · 2023Article
- How to improve the efficiency and the safety of real-time ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization in 2023: a narrative review.Annals of intensive care · 2023Review
- Regression discontinuity of blood culture contamination rate after changing of disinfectants: retrospective observational study.Scientific reports · 2021Observational
- Sites of blood collection and topical antiseptics associated with contaminated cultures: prospective observational study.Scientific reports · 2021Observational
- Comparison of global end-diastolic volume index derived from jugular and femoral indicator injection: a prospective observational study in patients equipped with both a PiCCO-2 and an EV-1000-device.Scientific reports · 2020Observational
- Expert consensus-based clinical practice guidelines management of intravascular catheters in the intensive care unit.Annals of intensive care · 2020Review
- Practical guide for safe central venous catheterization and management 2017.Journal of anesthesia · 2020Review
- Consistency of cardiac function index and global ejection fraction with global end-diastolic volume in patients with femoral central venous access for transpulmonary thermodilution: a prospective observational study.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2017Observational
- Observational
- Femoral indicator injection for transpulmonary thermodilution using the EV1000/VolumeView(®): do the same criteria apply as for the PiCCO(®)?Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B · 2016Article
- Pulmonary vascular permeability index and global end-diastolic volume: are the data consistent in patients with femoral venous access for transpulmonary thermodilution: a prospective observational study.BMC anesthesiology · 2014Observational
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo compare colonization and catheter-related bloodstream infection (CR-BSI) rates among three insertion sites (subclavian, internal jugular, femoral) used for central venous catheter (CVC) placement.
designTwenty-four-month prospective study, with relative effects analyzed by Cox proportional hazards regression.
settingEight-bed intensive care unit. PATIENTS: Four hundred and ten critically ill patients requiring CVC placement. MEASUREMENTS AND
resultsAll short-term multi-lumen CVCs, including antimicrobial-coated devices, were studied with management standardized. Six hundred and five CVCs (4,040 catheter days) were analyzed. Colonization and CR-BSI incidence were, respectively, 15.1 (95% CI 13.5-21.0) and 1.8 (95% CI 1.2-4.2) per 1,000 catheter-days. Colonization was higher at the internal jugular (HR 3.64; 95% CI 1.32-10.00; p=0.01) and femoral (HR 5.15; 95% CI 1.82-14.51; p=0.004) sites than at the subclavian site. The femoral site carried a greater risk of being colonized by non-S. epidermidis species than the subclavian and internal jugular sites combined (HR 4.15; 95% CI 1.79-9.61; p=0.001). CVCs inserted in the Department of Emergency Medicine were more colonized than those inserted in the ICU or operating room (HR 2.66; 95% CI 1.27-5.56; p=0.01), and CVCs were less colonized in females than in males (HR 0.49; 95% CI 0.26-0.89; p=0.02). No difference in CR-BSI rates was noted between the three sites.
conclusionsColonization was lowest at the subclavian site. Regional differences exist with respect to type of pathogen isolated. Colonization was influenced by insertion location and gender. The incidence of CR-BSI was not different.
Indexed as
Identifiers
18317732What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.