Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18316489›Full record

ArticleCirculation2008

Improving hypertension control in diabetes mellitus: the effects of collaborative and proactive health communication.

Aanand D Naik, Michael A Kallen, Annette Walder, Richard L Street

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Circulation, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 83 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
83citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

83 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Factors Influencing Physician Counseling on Cardiovascular Risk.Journal of primary care & community health · 2016
    Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

23 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Aanand D NaikHouston Center for Quality of Care and Utilization Studies, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center (152), 2002 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA. anaik@bcm.tmc.edu
Michael A Kallen
Annette Walder
Richard L Street

Funding

Goal-Setting for Older Persons with Multiple Morbid ConditionsK23AG027144 · NIA · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI NAIK, AANAND D. · 2006 to 2010
$681k
NIA NIH HHS 5K23AG027144NIA NIH HHS K23 AG027144
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCommunication between patients and clinicians using collaborative goals and treatment plans may overcome barriers to achieving hypertension control in routine diabetes mellitus care. We assessed the interrelation of patient-clinician communication factors to determine their independent associations with hypertension control in diabetes care. METHODS AND

resultsWe identified 566 older adults with diabetes mellitus and hypertension at the DeBakey VA Medical Center in Houston, Tex. Clinical and pharmacy data were collected, and a patient questionnaire was sent to all participants. A total of 212 individuals returned surveys. Logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the effect of patient characteristics, self-management behaviors, and communication factors on hypertension control. Three communication factors had significant associations with hypertension control. Two factors, patients' endorsement of a shared decision-making style (odds ratio 1.61, 95% confidence interval 1.01 to 2.57) and proactive communication with one's clinician about abnormal results of blood pressure self-monitoring (odds ratio 1.89, 95% confidence interval 1.10 to 3.26), had direct, independent associations in multivariate regression. Path analysis was used to investigate the direct and indirect effects of communication factors and hypertension control. Decision-making style (beta=0.20, P<0.01) and proactive communication (beta=0.50, P<0.0001) again demonstrated direct effects on hypertension control. A third factor, clinicians' use of collaborative communication when setting treatment goals, had a total effect on hypertension control of 0.16 (P<0.05) through its direct effects on decision-making style (beta=0.28, P<0.001) and proactive communication (beta=0.22, P<0.01).

conclusionsThree communication factors were found to have significant associations with hypertension control. Patient-clinician communication that facilitates collaborative blood pressure goals and patients' input related to the progress of treatment may improve rates of hypertension control in diabetes care independent of medication adherence.

Indexed as

Attitude to HealthBlood Pressure Monitoring, AmbulatoryCommunicationCooperative BehaviorDecision MakingPhysician-Patient RelationsAgedAged, 80 and overAntihypertensive AgentsAttitude of Health PersonnelComorbidityDiabetes ComplicationsDisease ManagementFemaleGoalsHumansAntihypertensive Agents

Identifiers

PMID18316489
PMCPMC3717409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.