ArticleBMC bioinformatics2008
Mining phenotypes for gene function prediction.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.
- HunFlair2 in a cross-corpus evaluation of biomedical named entity recognition and normalization tools.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- Predicting protein functions by applying predicate logic to biomedical literature.BMC bioinformatics · 2019Article
- ProtozoaDB 2.0: A Trypanosoma Brucei Case Study.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2017Article
- How can functional annotations be derived from profiles of phenotypic annotations?BMC bioinformatics · 2017Article
- The digital revolution in phenotyping.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2016Article
- Controlling false discoveries in high-dimensional situations: boosting with stability selection.BMC bioinformatics · 2015Article
- Modular organization of the human disease genes: a text-based network inference.Bioinformation · 2015Article
- An ontology approach to comparative phenomics in plants.Plant methods · 2015Article
- Methodology for the inference of gene function from phenotype data.BMC bioinformatics · 2014Article
- Toward knowledge support for analysis and interpretation of complex traits.Genome biology · 2013Review
- Protein function prediction using text-based features extracted from the biomedical literature: the CAFA challenge.BMC bioinformatics · 2013Article
- The laboratory-clinician team: a professional call to action to improve communication and collaboration for optimal patient care in chromosomal microarray testing.Journal of genetic counseling · 2012Article
- Phenotypic information in genomic variant databases enhances clinical care and research: the International Standards for Cytogenomic Arrays Consortium experience.Human mutation · 2012Article
- In silico prediction of drug targets in Vibrio cholerae.Protoplasma · 2011Article
- Discovering amino acid patterns on binding sites in protein complexes.Bioinformation · 2011Article
- A gene-phenotype network for the laboratory mouse and its implications for systematic phenotyping.PloS one · 2011Article
- Phenoclustering: online mining of cross-species phenotypes.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2010Article
- Transcriptional profiling of growth perturbations of the human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum.Nature biotechnology · 2010Article
- Integrating phenotype and gene expression data for predicting gene function.BMC bioinformatics · 2009Article
- Phenotype ontologies for mouse and man: bridging the semantic gap.Disease models & mechanismsReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHealth and disease of organisms are reflected in their phenotypes. Often, a genetic component to a disease is discovered only after clearly defining its phenotype. In the past years, many technologies to systematically generate phenotypes in a high-throughput manner, such as RNA interference or gene knock-out, have been developed and used to decipher functions for genes. However, there have been relatively few efforts to make use of phenotype data beyond the single genotype-phenotype relationships.
resultsWe present results on a study where we use a large set of phenotype data - in textual form - to predict gene annotation. To this end, we use text clustering to group genes based on their phenotype descriptions. We show that these clusters correlate well with several indicators for biological coherence in gene groups, such as functional annotations from the Gene Ontology (GO) and protein-protein interactions. We exploit these clusters for predicting gene function by carrying over annotations from well-annotated genes to other, less-characterized genes in the same cluster. For a subset of groups selected by applying objective criteria, we can predict GO-term annotations from the biological process sub-ontology with up to 72.6% precision and 16.7% recall, as evaluated by cross-validation. We manually verified some of these clusters and found them to exhibit high biological coherence, e.g. a group containing all available antennal Drosophila odorant receptors despite inconsistent GO-annotations.
conclusionThe intrinsic nature of phenotypes to visibly reflect genetic activity underlines their usefulness in inferring new gene functions. Thus, systematically analyzing these data on a large scale offers many possibilities for inferring functional annotation of genes. We show that text clustering can play an important role in this process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.