Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18315857›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2008

Transmembrane helix prediction using amino acid property features and latent semantic analysis.

Madhavi Ganapathiraju, N Balakrishnan, Raj Reddy, Judith Klein-Seetharaman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. AI-assisted models to predict chemotherapy drugs modified with CBeilstein journal of nanotechnology · 2024
    Article
  4. Targeting Essential Hypothetical Proteins ofBioMed research international · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. MtSSPdb: ThePlant physiology · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Madhavi GanapathirajuLanguage Technologies Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA. madhavi+@cs.cmu.edu
N Balakrishnan
Raj Reddy
Judith Klein-Seetharaman

Funding

Bridging Sequence Patterns and Structural DynamicsR01LM007994 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI BAHAR, IVET · 2004 to 2011
$3.0M
NLM NIH HHS LM07994-01NLM NIH HHS R01 LM007994
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrediction of transmembrane (TM) helices by statistical methods suffers from lack of sufficient training data. Current best methods use hundreds or even thousands of free parameters in their models which are tuned to fit the little data available for training. Further, they are often restricted to the generally accepted topology "cytoplasmic-transmembrane-extracellular" and cannot adapt to membrane proteins that do not conform to this topology. Recent crystal structures of channel proteins have revealed novel architectures showing that the above topology may not be as universal as previously believed. Thus, there is a need for methods that can better predict TM helices even in novel topologies and families.

resultsHere, we describe a new method "TMpro" to predict TM helices with high accuracy. To avoid overfitting to existing topologies, we have collapsed cytoplasmic and extracellular labels to a single state, non-TM. TMpro is a binary classifier which predicts TM or non-TM using multiple amino acid properties (charge, polarity, aromaticity, size and electronic properties) as features. The features are extracted from sequence information by applying the framework used for latent semantic analysis of text documents and are input to neural networks that learn the distinction between TM and non-TM segments. The model uses only 25 free parameters. In benchmark analysis TMpro achieves 95% segment F-score corresponding to 50% reduction in error rate compared to the best methods not requiring an evolutionary profile of a protein to be known. Performance is also improved when applied to more recent and larger high resolution datasets PDBTM and MPtopo. TMpro predictions in membrane proteins with unusual or disputed TM structure (K+ channel, aquaporin and HIV envelope glycoprotein) are discussed.

conclusionTMpro uses very few free parameters in modeling TM segments as opposed to the very large number of free parameters used in state-of-the-art membrane prediction methods, yet achieves very high segment accuracies. This is highly advantageous considering that high resolution transmembrane information is available only for very few proteins. The greatest impact of TMpro is therefore expected in the prediction of TM segments in proteins with novel topologies. Further, the paper introduces a novel method of extracting features from protein sequence, namely that of latent semantic analysis model. The success of this approach in the current context suggests that it can find potential applications in other sequence-based analysis problems. AVAILABILITY: http://linzer.blm.cs.cmu.edu/tmpro/ and http://flan.blm.cs.cmu.edu/tmpro/

Indexed as

AlgorithmsArtificial IntelligenceModels, ChemicalModels, MolecularAmino Acid SequenceComputer SimulationMembrane ProteinsMolecular Sequence DataProtein ConformationSemanticsSequence Analysis, ProteinMembrane Proteins

Identifiers

PMID18315857
PMCPMC2259405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.