Is GINA worth the wait?

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

1. The goldilocks conundrum: Disclosing discrimination risks in informed consent.Journal of genetic counseling · 2022
   Trial
2. A survey of U. S. state insurance commissioners concerning genetic testing and life insurance: Redux at 27.Journal of genetic counseling · 2020
   Article
3. Reconceptualizing harms and benefits in the genomic age.Personalized medicine · 2018
   Article
4. The translational potential of research on the ethical, legal, and social implications of genomics.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2015
   Review
5. Genomic knowledge sharing: A review of the ethical and legal issues.Applied & translational genomics · 2014
   Review
6. Informed consent in genomics and genetic research.Annual review of genomics and human genetics · 2010
   Review
7. Currents in contemporary ethics. GINA, the ADA, and genetic discrimination in employment.The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics · 2008
   Article
8. Family information service participation increases the rates of mutation testing among members of families with BRCA1/2 mutations.The breast journal
   Article
9. Health insurance and the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008: implications for public health policy and practice.Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974)
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as