Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18313328›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry2008

On-line electrogeneration of copper-peptide complexes in microspray mass spectrometry.

Michel Prudent, Hubert H Girault

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Peptide fragmentation by corona discharge induced electrochemical ionization.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2010
    Article
  8. Oxidative protein labeling in mass-spectrometry-based proteomics.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2010
    Review
  9. Amino acid influence on copper binding to peptides: cysteine versus arginine.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2010
    Article
  10. A new copper containing MALDI matrix that yields high abundances of [peptide + Cu]+ ions.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2009
    Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michel PrudentLaboratoire d'Electrochimie Physique et Analytique, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Hubert H Girault
École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The interaction of copper ions with peptides was investigated by electrospray mass spectrometry. Two electrospray micro-emitters were compared, the first one with a platinum electrode using a copper(II) electrolyte solution containing a peptide sample, and the second one with a sacrificial copper anode in a water/methanol solution containing only a peptide (i.e., angiotensin III, bradykinin, or Leu-enkephalin). The former yielded mainly Cu(2+) complexes either with histidine residues or with the peptide backbone (Cu(+) complexes can be also formed due to gas-phase reactions), whereas the latter can generate a mixture of both Cu(+) and Cu(2+) aqueous complexes that yield different complexation patterns. This study shows that electrospray emitters with soluble copper anodes enable the study of Cu(I)-peptide complexes in solution.

Indexed as

AngiotensinsBradykininCopperEnkephalin, LeucineHumansMicrochemistryPeptidesSpectrometry, Mass, Electrospray IonizationAngiotensinsBradykininCoppercuprous ionEnkephalin, LeucinePeptides

Identifiers

PMID18313328
OpenAlexW2121177691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.