Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18313071›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular biology2008

Kinetic model for the coupling between allosteric transitions in GroEL and substrate protein folding and aggregation.

Riina Tehver, D Thirumalai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular biology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Iterative annealing mechanism explains the functions of the GroEL and RNA chaperones.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2020
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Molecular chaperones maximize the native state yield on biological times by driving substrates out of equilibrium.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  7. Thermosensitivity of growth is determined by chaperone-mediated proteome reallocation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Protein folding and aggregation in bacteria.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2010
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Riina TehverBiophysics Program, Institute for Physical Science and Technology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA.
D Thirumalai

Funding

GroEL: How Is Allostery Coupled to Assisted Folding?R01GM067851 · NIGMS · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI LORIMER, GEORGE H. · 2003 to 2007
$1.5M
Molecular Basis for Protein Interactions with a Biological NanomachineF32GM082009 · NIGMS · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI TEHVER, RIINA · 2007 to 2009
$147k
NIGMS NIH HHS 1F32GM082009NIGMS NIH HHS 1R01GM067851-01NIGMS NIH HHS F32 GM082009NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM067851
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The bacterial chaperonin GroEL and the co-chaperonin GroES assist in the folding of a number of structurally unrelated substrate proteins (SPs). In the absence of chaperonins, SP folds by the kinetic partitioning mechanism (KPM), according to which a fraction of unfolded molecules reaches the native state directly, while the remaining fraction gets trapped in a potentially aggregation-prone misfolded state. During the catalytic reaction cycle, GroEL undergoes a series of allosteric transitions (T<-->R-->R"-->T) triggered by SP capture, ATP binding and hydrolysis, and GroES binding. We developed a general kinetic model that takes into account the coupling between the rates of the allosteric transitions and the folding and aggregation of the SP. Our model, in which the GroEL allosteric rates and SP-dependent folding and aggregation rates are independently varied without prior assumption, quantitatively fits the GroEL concentration-dependent data on the yield of native ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (Rubisco) as a function of time. The extracted kinetic parameters for the GroEL reaction cycle are consistent with the available values from independent experiments. In addition, we also obtained physically reasonable parameters for the kinetic steps in the reaction cycle that are difficult to measure. If experimental values for GroEL allosteric rates are used, the time-dependent changes in native-state yield at eight GroEL concentrations can be quantitatively fit using only three SP-dependent parameters. The model predicts that the differences in the efficiencies (as measured by yields of the native state) of GroEL, single-ring mutant (SR1), and variants of SR1, in the rescue of mitochondrial malate dehydrogenase, citrate synthase, and Rubisco, are related to the large variations in the allosteric transition rates. We also show that GroEL/S mutants that efficiently fold one SP at the expense of all others are due to a decrease in the rate of a key step in the reaction cycle, which implies that wild-type GroEL has evolved as a compromise between generality and specificity. We predict that, under maximum loading conditions and saturating ATP concentration, the efficiency of GroEL (using parameters for Rubisco) depends predominantly on the rate of R-->R" transition, while the equilibrium constant of the T<-->R has a small effect only. Both under sub- and superstoichiometric GroEL concentrations, enhanced efficiency is achieved by rapid turnover of the reaction cycle, which is in accord with the predictions of the iterative annealing mechanism. The effects are most dramatic at substoichiometric conditions (most relevant for in vivo situations) when SP aggregation can outcompete capture of SP by chaperonins.

Indexed as

Protein FoldingAllosteric RegulationChaperonin 60KineticsModels, BiologicalModels, TheoreticalMutant ProteinsProtein BindingRibulose-Bisphosphate CarboxylaseSubstrate SpecificityChaperonin 60Mutant ProteinsRibulose-Bisphosphate Carboxylase

Identifiers

PMID18313071
PMCPMC2364733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.