Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18311155›Full record

ReviewBritish journal of pharmacology2008

Clinical pharmacological issues in the development of acute stroke therapies.

G A Ford

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in British journal of pharmacology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact, top 97% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. PRIMEDTranslational stroke research · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Mucosal tolerance to E-selectin promotes the survival of newly generated neuroblasts via regulatory T-cell induction after stroke in spontaneously hypertensive rats.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2009
    Article
  12. Nitrones as therapeutics.Free radical biology & medicine · 2008
    Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

G A FordClinical Research Centre, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK. g.a.ford@ncl.ac.uk
Newcastle College · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The demonstration of the ischaemic penumbra in animal models and the effectiveness of reperfusion therapy in humans led to considerable optimism for neuroprotection in acute stroke. Initial experience with failure of phase II and III trials led to the STAIR recommendations for pre-clinical and clinical studies. Review of pre-clinical studies suggests that selection of agents for clinical development may not have been optimal. The neuroprotective agent NXY-059 fulfilled pre-clinical and many clinical STAIR criteria but a second large phase III study failed to demonstrate any benefit. Many of the STAIR criteria have not been fulfilled in the development of recent neuroprotective agents. Other issues not addressed include the use of animal models more reflective of older stroke patients with physiological derangement, demonstration of drug distribution to the proposed site of action in humans, selection of patients with salvageable tissue, achieving very early treatment, refinement of measurement of neurological impairment and disability, and physiological optimization in proof of concept human studies. Increasing the number and quality of clinical centres undertaking acute stroke research, use of surrogate imaging markers and adaptive dose designs in phase II trials could improve the likelihood of identifying an effective neuroprotective. Neuroprotection in acute stroke remains a significant challenge but has not been clearly shown to be ineffective. Given the profound burden of stroke and limited applicability of reperfusion to currently at best 10% patients, further proof of concept studies of neuroprotection remain indicated with careful review of pre-clinical data and more rigorous phase II trial design.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAnimalsBiomarkersBrain IschemiaClinical Trials as TopicDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalHumansReperfusion InjuryStrokeBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID18311155
PMCPMC2268049
OpenAlexW307965847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.