Evidence map›Paper›PMID 1831069›Full record

ArticleCell and tissue research1991

Annexin II (calpactin I) in the mouse mammary gland: immunolocalization by light- and electron microscopy.

S E Handel, M E Rennison, C J Wilde, R D Burgoyne

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cell and tissue research, 1991. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Feedback control of milk secretion from milk.Journal of mammary gland biology and neoplasia · 1996
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

S E HandelDepartment of Physiology, University of Liverpool, UK.
M E Rennison
C J Wilde
R D Burgoyne
University of Liverpool · GBHannah Research Foundation · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To elucidate the putative role of annexin II (calpactin I) in the secretory function of mammary tissue its immunolocalization in the mammary gland of pregnant and lactating mice was investigated by light- and electron microscopy using the immunoperoxidase technique. A low level of fairly uniform annexin II staining was evident throughout the gland despite its mixed composition during pregnancy. In lactating tissue it was revealed that apparently mature alveoli contained a concentration of annexin II staining outlining their epithelium. The staining was localised by immuno-electron microscopy to the apical membrane of these alveolar epithelial cells and their microvillar extensions. There was also an apparent association of annexin II with vesicles of a range of sizes located near, or actually fused with, the apical membrane. Many of the small, stained vesicles could clearly be identified as casein-containing vesicles while the large vesicles were apparently associated with either casein granules or possibly lipid. The appearance of a selective concentration of annexin II in apparently actively secreting mammary epithelial cells, as revealed in this study, is consistent with a possible structural and/or functional role for this protein at the membranes participating in the secretion of protein and possibly lipid from these secretory cells.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceAnimalsAnnexinsCalcium-Binding ProteinsEpitheliumExocytosisFemaleImmunoblottingLactationMammary Glands, AnimalMiceMicroscopy, ImmunoelectronMolecular Sequence DataPregnancyAnnexinsCalcium-Binding Proteins

Identifiers

PMID1831069
OpenAlexW1995655730

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.