Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18310421›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2008

Interactions between food-borne pathogens and protozoa isolated from lettuce and spinach.

Poornima Gourabathini, Maria T Brandl, Katherine S Redding, John H Gunderson, Sharon G Berk

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 108 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Cappable-Seq Reveals Specific Patterns of Metabolism and Virulence forInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Detection of Antimicrobial ResistantFrontiers in veterinary science · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Interactions between Human Norovirus Surrogates and Acanthamoeba spp.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2015
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Survival of Salmonella enterica in aerated and nonaerated wastewaters from dairy lagoons.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2014
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Poornima GourabathiniCenter for the Management, Utilization, and Protection of Water Resources, Tennessee Technological University, Cookeville, TN 38505, USA. sberk@tntech.edu
Maria T Brandl
Katherine S Redding
John H Gunderson
Sharon G Berk
Tennessee Technological University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The survival of Salmonella enterica was recently shown to increase when the bacteria were sequestered in expelled food vacuoles (vesicles) of Tetrahymena. Because fresh produce is increasingly linked to outbreaks of enteric illness, the present investigation aimed to determine the prevalence of protozoa on spinach and lettuce and to examine their interactions with S. enterica, Escherichia coli O157:H7, and Listeria monocytogenes. Glaucoma sp., Colpoda steinii, and Acanthamoeba palestinensis were cultured from store-bought spinach and lettuce and used in our study. A strain of Tetrahymena pyriformis previously isolated from spinach and a soil-borne Tetrahymena sp. were also used. Washed protozoa were allowed to graze on green fluorescent protein- or red fluorescent protein-labeled enteric pathogens. Significant differences in interactions among the various protist-enteric pathogen combinations were observed. Vesicles were produced by Glaucoma with all of the bacterial strains, although L. monocytogenes resulted in the smallest number per ciliate. Vesicle production was observed also during grazing of Tetrahymena on E. coli O157:H7 and S. enterica but not during grazing on L. monocytogenes, in vitro and on leaves. All vesicles contained intact fluorescing bacteria. In contrast, C. steinii and the amoeba did not produce vesicles from any of the enteric pathogens, nor were pathogens trapped within their cysts. Studies of the fate of E. coli O157:H7 in expelled vesicles revealed that by 4 h after addition of spinach extract, the bacteria multiplied and escaped the vesicles. The presence of protozoa on leafy vegetables and their sequestration of enteric bacteria in vesicles indicate that they may play an important role in the ecology of human pathogens on produce.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell CountColony Count, MicrobialEscherichia coli O157EukaryotaGenes, ReporterGreen Fluorescent ProteinsLactucaListeria monocytogenesLuminescent ProteinsMicroscopy, FluorescenceRed Fluorescent ProteinSalmonella entericaSpinacia oleraceaStaining and LabelingTransport VesiclesGreen Fluorescent ProteinsLuminescent ProteinsRed Fluorescent Protein

Identifiers

PMID18310421
PMCPMC2293137
OpenAlexW1963838476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.