Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18310313›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of sports medicine2008

Response of knee ligaments to prolotherapy in a rat injury model.

Kristina T Jensen, David P Rabago, Thomas M Best, Jeffrey J Patterson, Ray Vanderby

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of sports medicine, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 105 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Conservative Treatment of Chronic Achilles Tendinopathy: A Systematic Review.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2019
    Review
  15. The effectiveness of prolotherapy on failed rotator cuff repair surgery.Turkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Prolotherapy Induces an Inflammatory Response in Human Tenocytes In Vitro.Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2017
    Article
  18. Article
  19. A Systematic Review of Dextrose Prolotherapy for Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain.Clinical medicine insights. Arthritis and musculoskeletal disorders · 2016
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kristina T JensenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
David P Rabago
Thomas M Best
Jeffrey J Patterson
Ray Vanderby
University of Wisconsin–Madison · USThe Ohio State University · US

Funding

The Efficacy of Prolotherapy in Osteoarthritic Knee PainK23AT001879 · NCCIH · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI RABAGO, DAVID P · 2004 to 2008
$601k
Healing response of knee ligaments to prolotherapyF31AT002453 · NCCIH · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON · PI JENSEN, KRISTINA T · 2004 to 2005
$52k
NCCIH NIH HHS F31 AT002453NCCIH NIH HHS F31AT002453NCCIH NIH HHS K23 AT001879NCCIH NIH HHS K23AT001879
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProlotherapy is an alternative therapy for chronic musculoskeletal injury including joint laxity. The commonly used injectant, D-glucose (dextrose), is hypothesized to improve ligament mechanics and decrease pain through an inflammatory mechanism. No study has investigated the mechanical effects of prolotherapy on stretch-injured ligaments. HYPOTHESES: Dextrose injections will enlarge cross-sectional area, decrease laxity, strengthen, and stiffen stretch-injured medial collateral ligaments (MCLs) compared with controls. Dextrose prolotherapy will increase collagen fibril diameter and density of stretch-injured MCLs. STUDY

designControlled laboratory study.

methodsTwenty-four rats were bilaterally MCL stretch-injured, and the induced laxity was measured. After 2 weeks, 32 MCLs were injected twice, 1 week apart, with either dextrose or saline control; 16 MCLs received no injection. Seven uninjured rats (14 MCLs) were additional controls. Two weeks after the second injection, ligament laxity, mechanical properties (n = 8), and collagen fibril diameter and density (n = 3) were assessed.

resultsThe injury model created consistent ligament laxity (P < .05) that was not altered by dextrose injections. Cross-sectional area of dextrose-injected MCLs was increased 30% and 90% compared with saline and uninjured controls, respectively (P < .05). Collagen fibril diameter and density were decreased in injured ligaments compared with uninjured controls (P < .05), but collagen fibril characteristics were not different between injured groups.

conclusionDextrose injections increased the cross-sectional area of MCLs compared with saline-injected and uninjured controls. Dextrose injections did not alter other measured properties in this model. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Our results suggest that clinical improvement from prolotherapy may not result from direct effects on ligament biomechanics.

Indexed as

AnimalsArthralgiaBiomechanical PhenomenaComplementary TherapiesGlucoseInflammationInjections, Intra-ArticularJoint InstabilityMedial Collateral Ligament, KneeRatsRats, Sprague-DawleySclerosing SolutionsGlucoseSclerosing Solutions

Identifiers

PMID18310313
PMCPMC3164307
OpenAlexW2001339981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.