ArticleBiophysical journal2008
Tropomyosin dynamics in cardiac thin filaments: a multisite forster resonance energy transfer and anisotropy study.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Myosin and Other Energy-Transducing ATPases: Structural Dynamics Studied by Electron Paramagnetic Resonance.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- Tropomyosin dynamics during cardiac muscle contraction as governed by a multi-well energy landscape.Progress in biophysics and molecular biology · 2019Article
- Order-Disorder Transitions in the Cardiac Troponin Complex.Journal of molecular biology · 2016Review
- Tropomyosin dynamics.Journal of muscle research and cell motility · 2014Review
- Calcium-dependent interaction sites of tropomyosin on reconstituted muscle thin filaments with bound Myosin heads as studied by site-directed spin-labeling.Biophysical journal · 2013Article
- Article
- Interaction sites of tropomyosin in muscle thin filament as identified by site-directed spin-labeling.Biophysical journal · 2011Article
- Switch action of troponin on muscle thin filament as revealed by spin labeling and pulsed EPR.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2010Article
- Fretting about FRET: failure of the ideal dipole approximation.Biophysical journal · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Cryoelectron microscopy studies have identified distinct locations of tropomyosin (Tm) within the Ca(2+)-free, Ca(2+)-saturated, and myosin-S1-saturated states of the thin filament. On the other hand, steady-state Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) studies using functional, reconstituted thin filaments under physiological conditions of temperature and solvent have failed to detect any movement of Tm upon Ca(2+) binding. In this investigation, an optimized system for FRET and anisotropy analyses of cardiac tropomyosin (cTm) dynamics was developed that employed a single tethered donor probe within a Tm dimer. Multisite FRET and fluorescence anisotropy analyses showed that S1 binding to Ca(2+) thin filaments triggered a uniform displacement of cTm toward F-actin but that Ca(2+) binding alone did not change FRET efficiency, most likely due to thermally driven fluctuations of cTm on the thin filament that decreased the effective separation of the donor probe between the blocked and closed states. Although Ca(2+) binding to the thin filament did not significantly change FRET efficiency, such a change was demonstrated when the thin filament was partially saturated with S1. FRET was also used to show that stoichiometric binding of S1 to Ca(2+)-activated thin filaments decreased the amplitude of Tm fluctuations and revealed a strong correlation between the cooperative binding of S1 to the closed state and the movement of cTm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.