ReviewJournal of physiology and biochemistry2007
Stroke pathophysiology: management challenges and new treatment advances.
Review in Journal of physiology and biochemistry, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Obesity and Stroke: Does the Paradox Apply for Stroke?Neurointervention · 2021Review
- Peripheral administration of human adrenomedullin and its binding protein attenuates stroke-induced apoptosis and brain injury in rats.Molecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stroke is the second leading cause of death and the first cause of lost disability-adjusted years in developed countries. During the past decade, new developments in thrombolytic therapy have led to the implementation of emergency intervention protocols for the treatment of ischemic stroke, replacing the widespread sense of therapeutic nihilism in the past. Treatment with rtPA has shown to be effective within the first 3 hours following stroke onset and the FDA and the European Medical Agency (EMEA) have approved its use. Acknowledging the urgency and intricacies of stroke, Stroke Units allow the monitoring of physiological parameters in the acute phase of stroke and are considered an important management tool that can significantly improve the quality of care provided to the patient. The concept of neuroprotective therapy for acute ischemic stroke to salvage tissue at risk and improve functional outcome is based on sound scientific principles and extensive preclinical animal studies demonstrating efficacy. However, most neuroprotective drugs in clinical trials have failed, possibly due to inadequate preclinical testing or flawed clinical development programs. Several new treatment strategies are under development and are being tested. This review is directed at understanding the management of acute ischemic stroke pathophysiology. We address the management challenges and new treatment advances by integrating the knowledge of possible pharmacological targets for acute ischemic stroke. We hope to shed new light upon the controversy surrounding the management of acute ischemic stroke in an attempt to elucidate why failed clinical trials continue to occur despite promising neuroprotective preclinical studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
18309782What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.