ArticleJournal of physiology and biochemistry2007
Lack of evidence in vivo for nitrergic inhibition by Escherichia coli (STa) enterotoxin of fluid absorption from rat proximal jejunum.
Article in Journal of physiology and biochemistry, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Enterocyte chloride and water secretion into the small intestine after enterotoxin challenge: unifying hypothesis or intellectual dead end?Journal of physiology and biochemistry · 2008Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fluid absorption from the proximal jejunum of the anaesthetised rat was measured in vivo by fluid recovery. As expected, heat stable (STa) enterotoxin from E. coli reduced fluid absorption. Neither intraperitoneal L-NAME, thought to inhibit a putative neurally mediated action of STa, nor similar doses of D-NAME, ameliorated the inhibitory effect on jejunal fluid absorption of STa. Luminally perfused 10 mM sodium nitroprusside (SNP) had no effect on fluid absorption when expressed per gram dry weight per hour but reduced fluid absorption when expressed per cm length per hour. Similarly, 80 but not 40 mg/Kg of L-NAME reduced fluid absorption when expressed per cm length per hour, while the same dose of D-NAME did not. L-NAME and SNP significantly increased the wet weight to dry weight and the length to dry weight ratio of perfused loops. We conjecture that smooth muscle relaxation caused by these compounds increases interstitial fluid volumes that can be misconstrued as changes in absorption when this is expressed per cm length or per tissue wet weight. When fluid absorption is expressed per gram dry weight of tissue, there is no evidence for a role of nitric oxide in normal or STa inhibited fluid absorption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
18309779What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.