Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18309312›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Drug discovery2008

Carrier-mediated cellular uptake of pharmaceutical drugs: an exception or the rule?

Paul D Dobson, Douglas B Kell

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Drug discovery, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 166 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
166citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

166 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Metabolic Reprogramming in Cancer Stem Cells.Cancer treatment and research · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Prodrug Approach as a Strategy to Enhance Drug Permeability.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Chemical Reactions in Living Systems.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  20. Review

106 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Paul D DobsonSchool of Chemistry and Manchester Interdisciplinary Biocentre, University of Manchester, 131 Princess Street, Manchester M1 7DN, UK.
Douglas B Kell

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/D007,747/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is generally thought that many drug molecules are transported across biological membranes via passive diffusion at a rate related to their lipophilicity. However, the types of biophysical forces involved in the interaction of drugs with lipid membranes are no different from those involved in their interaction with proteins, and so arguments based on lipophilicity could also be applied to drug uptake by membrane transporters or carriers. In this article, we discuss the evidence supporting the idea that rather than being an exception, carrier-mediated and active uptake of drugs may be more common than is usually assumed - including a summary of specific cases in which drugs are known to be taken up into cells via defined carriers - and consider the implications for drug discovery and development.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiological TransportCell MembraneCell Membrane PermeabilityHumansMembrane Transport ProteinsPharmaceutical PreparationsMembrane Transport ProteinsPharmaceutical Preparations

Identifiers

PMID18309312

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.