Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18308822›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of physiology2008

Retrotrapezoid nucleus and central chemoreception.

Patrice G Guyenet, Ruth L Stornetta, Douglas A Bayliss

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of physiology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 75 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
75citing papers in PubMed
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

75 citing papers in PubMed, 165 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. COBrain structure & function · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Apneic Sleep, Insufficient Sleep, and Hypertension.Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) · 2019
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Patrice G GuyenetUniversity of Virginia Health System, P.O. Box 800735, 1300 Jefferson Park Avenue, Charlottesville, VA 22908-0735, USA. pgg@virginia.edu.
Ruth L Stornetta
Douglas A Bayliss
University of Virginia · US

Funding

Retrotrapezoid nucleus and central chemoreceptionR01HL074011 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE · PI GUYENET, PATRICE G. · 2003 to 2018
$6.6M
Cellular/Molecular Mechanisms of Respiratory Neuronal ChemosensitivityR01HL108609 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI Douglas A. Bayliss · 2011 to 2026
$6.5M
Organization of Central Sympathic PathwaysR01HL028785 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE · PI STORNETTA, RUTH L · 1985 to 2020
$5.0M
Molecular Bases for Motoneuronal NeuromodulationR01NS033583 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE · PI BAYLISS, DOUGLAS A. · 2001 to 2011
$3.2M
ORGANIZATION OF CENTRAL SYMPATHETIC PATHWAYSR37HL028785 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE · PI GUYENET, PATRICE G. · 1999 to 2008
$3.0M
NHLBI NIH HHS HL074011NHLBI NIH HHS HL28785NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL028785NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL074011NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL108609NHLBI NIH HHS R37 HL028785NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS033583
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The 'distributed chemoreception theory' attributes the central chemoreflex (the stimulation of breathing by CNS acidification) to the cumulative effects of pH on multiple classes of respiratory neurons as well as on their tonic sources of drive. Opinions differ as to how many classes of pH-sensitive neurons contribute to the central chemoreflex but the number of candidates is high and growing fast. The 'specialized chemoreceptor theory', endorsed here, attributes the chemoreflex to a limited number of specialized neurons. These neurons (the central chemoreceptors) would drive a respiratory pattern generator that is not or minimally activated by acidification. In this review we first describe the properties of the retrotrapezoid nucleus (RTN) and argue that this nucleus may contain the most important central chemoreceptors. Next, we subject the assumptions that underlie the distributed chemoreception theory to a critical analysis. We propose several explanations for the apparent contradiction between the two competing theories of central chemoreception. We attribute much of the current controversy to premature extrapolations of the effects of acidification on neurons recorded in vitro (chemosensitivity) and to a semantic confusion between chemosensitivity and chemoreception (the mechanism by which CO(2) or pH activates breathing in vivo).

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalBrainCarbon DioxideChemoreceptor CellsHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationMedulla OblongataNeurons, AfferentRespiratory MechanicsCarbon Dioxide

Identifiers

PMID18308822
PMCPMC2465196
OpenAlexW1505974711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.