Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18307850›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2008

What do doctors really think about the relevance and impact of GP appraisal 3 years on? A survey of Scottish GPs.

Iain Colthart, Niall Cameron, Brian McKinstry, David Blaney

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. A new comprehensive model for Continuous Professional Development.The European journal of general practice · 2017
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Verifying appraisal evidence using feedback from trained peers: views and experiences of Scottish GP appraisers.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2009
    Article
  7. Appraisals.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2008
    Article
  8. Appraisals.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2008
    Article
  9. Regulation: appraisal alone is not enough.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2008
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Iain ColthartNHS Education for Scotland, Edinburgh. iain.colthart@nes.scot.nhs.uk
Niall Cameron
Brian McKinstry
David Blaney

Funding

Chief Scientist Office CZP/4/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of appraisal is to provide an opportunity for individuals to reflect on their work to facilitate learning and development. Appraisal for GPs has been a contractual requirement since 2004 in Scotland, and is seen as an integral part of revalidation.

aimTo investigate the outcomes of GP appraisal in terms of whether it has prompted change in medical practice, education and learning, career development, attitudes to health and probity, how GPs organise their work, and their perception of the overall value of the process. DESIGN OF STUDY: A cross-sectional postal questionnaire.

settingGP performers in Scotland who had undertaken appraisal.

methodThe questionnaire was based on the seven principles outlined in Good Medical Practice, a literature review, and previous local research. The survey was conducted on a strictly anonymous basis with a random, representative sample of GPs.

resultsFifty-three per cent (671/1278) responded. Forty-seven per cent (308/661) thought that appraisal had altered their educational activity, 33% (217/660) reported undertaking further education or training as a result of appraisal, and 13% (89/660) felt that appraisal had influenced their career development. Opinion was evenly split on the overall value of appraisal.

conclusionAppraisal can have a significant impact on all aspects of a GP's professional life, and those who value the process report continuing benefit in how they manage their education and professional development. However, many perceive limited or no benefit. The renewed emphasis on appraisal requires examination of these findings and discussion of how appraisal can become more relevant.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelEmployee Performance AppraisalClinical CompetenceCross-Sectional StudiesEducation, Medical, ContinuingFamily PracticeHumansScotlandSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID18307850
PMCPMC2233956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.