ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2008
What do doctors really think about the relevance and impact of GP appraisal 3 years on? A survey of Scottish GPs.
Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reviewing Competence in Practice: Reform of Continuing Professional Development for Irish Pharmacists.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- A new comprehensive model for Continuous Professional Development.The European journal of general practice · 2017Article
- The general practitioner workforce crisis in England: a qualitative study of how appraisal and revalidation are contributing to intentions to leave practice.BMC family practice · 2016Article
- Using clinical supervision to improve the quality and safety of patient care: a response to Berwick and Francis.BMC medical education · 2015Article
- Barriers and attitudes influencing non-engagement in a peer feedback model to inform evidence for GP appraisal.BMC medical education · 2012Article
- Verifying appraisal evidence using feedback from trained peers: views and experiences of Scottish GP appraisers.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2009Article
- Appraisals.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2008Article
- Appraisals.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2008Article
- Regulation: appraisal alone is not enough.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on byAppraisals.2008
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe aim of appraisal is to provide an opportunity for individuals to reflect on their work to facilitate learning and development. Appraisal for GPs has been a contractual requirement since 2004 in Scotland, and is seen as an integral part of revalidation.
aimTo investigate the outcomes of GP appraisal in terms of whether it has prompted change in medical practice, education and learning, career development, attitudes to health and probity, how GPs organise their work, and their perception of the overall value of the process. DESIGN OF STUDY: A cross-sectional postal questionnaire.
settingGP performers in Scotland who had undertaken appraisal.
methodThe questionnaire was based on the seven principles outlined in Good Medical Practice, a literature review, and previous local research. The survey was conducted on a strictly anonymous basis with a random, representative sample of GPs.
resultsFifty-three per cent (671/1278) responded. Forty-seven per cent (308/661) thought that appraisal had altered their educational activity, 33% (217/660) reported undertaking further education or training as a result of appraisal, and 13% (89/660) felt that appraisal had influenced their career development. Opinion was evenly split on the overall value of appraisal.
conclusionAppraisal can have a significant impact on all aspects of a GP's professional life, and those who value the process report continuing benefit in how they manage their education and professional development. However, many perceive limited or no benefit. The renewed emphasis on appraisal requires examination of these findings and discussion of how appraisal can become more relevant.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.