Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18307372›Full record

ArticleClinical pharmacokinetics2008

Application of basic pharmacokinetic concepts to analysis of microdialysis data: illustration with imipenem muscle distribution.

Claire Dahyot, Sandrine Marchand, Mikael Bodin, Bertrand Debeane, Olivier Mimoz, William Couet

Abstract readControlled Clinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Claire DahyotINSERM ERI-23, Poitiers, France.
Sandrine Marchand
Mikael Bodin
Bertrand Debeane
Olivier Mimoz
William Couet
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers · FRInserm · FRUniversité de Poitiers · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMicrodialysis studies of antibacterial tissue distribution in critically ill patients have sometimes led to results that were spectacular but inconsistent with basic pharmacokinetic concepts.

objectiveTo conduct a study of imipenem distribution in the muscle of healthy volunteers and critical care patients in order to compare real-life data with theory.

methodsMicrodialysis catheters were placed into the quadriceps, and probe recoveries were determined individually in vivo using a retrodialysis-by-drug method. Unbound imipenem concentrations were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography in plasma ultrafiltrates and muscle dialysates, and submitted to noncompartmental pharmacokinetic analysis.

resultsIndividual unbound imipenem concentrations in plasma and muscle extracellular fluid were virtually superimposed at any time, both in healthy volunteers and in critical care patients.

conclusionThese new results are not consistent with previously published data obtained in similar conditions by another group, but they are in agreement with results previously obtained in rats, as well as being consistent with basic pharmacokinetic concepts.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsArea Under CurveChromatography, High Pressure LiquidCritical IllnessExtracellular SpaceFemaleHumansImipenemMaleMicrodialysisMiddle AgedMuscle, SkeletalTime FactorsTissue DistributionAnti-Bacterial AgentsImipenem

Identifiers

PMID18307372
OpenAlexW122033686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.