Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18305563›Full record

Trial reportLeukemia2008

Minimal residual disease (MRD) analysis in the non-MRD-based ALL IC-BFM 2002 protocol for childhood ALL: is it possible to avoid MRD testing?

E Fronkova, E Mejstrikova, S Avigad, K W Chik, L Castillo, S Manor, L Reznickova, T Valova, K Zdrahalova, O Hrusak and 8 more

Abstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Leukemia, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Correlation of Day 8 Steroid Response with Bone Marrow Status Measured on Days 14 and 35, in Patients with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Being Treated with BFM Protocol.Indian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 8 institutions in 6 countries.

E FronkovaDepartment of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, CLIP, Second Medical School, Charles University and University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic.
E Mejstrikova
S Avigad
K W Chik
L Castillo
S Manor
L Reznickova
T Valova
K Zdrahalova
O Hrusak
Y Jabali
M Schrappe
V Conter
S Izraeli
C K Li
B Stark
J Stary
J Trka
Charles University · CZChinese University of Hong Kong · CNSchneider Children's Medical Center · ILTel Aviv University · ILCentro Hospitalario Pereira Rossell · UYNemocnice České Budějovice · CZUniversity Hospital Schleswig-Holstein · DEUniversity of Milano-Bicocca · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ALL IC-BFM 2002 protocol was created as an alternative to the MRD-based AIEOP-BFM ALL 2000 study, to integrate early response criteria into risk-group stratification in countries not performing routine PCR-based MRD testing. ALL IC stratification comprises the response to prednisone, bone marrow (BM) morphology at days 15 and 33, age, WBC and BCR/ABL or MLL/AF4 presence. Here, we compared this stratification to the MRD-based criteria using MRD evaluation in 163 patients from four ALL IC member countries at days 8, 15 and 33 and week 12. MRD negativity at day 33 was associated with an age of 1-5 years, WBC<20,000 microl(-1), non-T immunophenotype, good prednisone response and non-M3 morphology at day 15. There were no significant associations with gender or hyperdiploidy in the study group, or with TEL/AML1 fusion within BCP-ALL. Patients with M1/2 BM at day 8 tended to be MRD negative at week 12. Patients stratified into the standard-risk group had a better response than intermediate-risk group patients. However, 34% of them were MRD positive at day 33 and/or week 12. Our findings revealed that morphology-based ALL IC risk-group stratification allows the identification of most MRD high-risk patients, but fails to discriminate the MRD low-risk group assigned to therapy reduction.

Indexed as

AdolescentAge FactorsCell ShapeChildChild, PreschoolHumansImmunophenotypingInfantLeukocyte CountNeoplasm, ResidualPrecursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-LymphomaPrognosisRisk AssessmentTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID18305563
OpenAlexW1981672005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.