Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18304365›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2008

Endothelin-1 precursor peptides correlate with severity of disease and outcome in patients with community acquired pneumonia.

Philipp Schuetz, Daiana Stolz, Beat Mueller, Nils G Morgenthaler, Joachim Struck, Christian Mueller, Roland Bingisser, Michael Tamm, Mirjam Christ-Crain

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03651635 (To Assess and Validate the Use of MR-proADM and the CT-proET-1/MR-proADM Ratio as Prognostic Markers During the First 7 Days of ICU Treat-ment), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03651635 completednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

To Assess and Validate the Use of MR-proADM and the CT-proET-1/MR-proADM Ratio as Prognostic Markers During the First 7 Days of ICU Treat-ment

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of ZurichRan2018 to 2019Enrolled533ConditionsAcute Phase Biomarkers, Medical ICU Admitted PatientsArmsBlood sampling for MR-proADM & CT-proET-1
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Endothelins in inflammatory neurological diseases.Pharmacology & therapeutics · 2019
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Aspiration-induced lung injury.Critical care medicine · 2011
    Review
  17. Biomarkers in the diagnosis of aspiration syndromes.Expert review of molecular diagnostics · 2010
    Review
  18. Sepsis biomarkers: a review.Critical care (London, England) · 2010
    Review
  19. Biomarkers: a definite plus in pneumonia.Mediators of inflammation · 2009
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Philipp SchuetzDepartment of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Switzerland. SchuetzP@uhbs.ch
Daiana Stolz
Beat Mueller
Nils G Morgenthaler
Joachim Struck
Christian Mueller
Roland Bingisser
Michael Tamm
Mirjam Christ-Crain
University Hospital of Basel · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCirculating levels of endothelin-1 are increased in sepsis and correlate with severity of disease. A rapid and easy immunoassay has been developed to measure the more stable ET-1 precursor peptides proET-1. The objective of this study was to assess the diagnostic and prognostic value of proET-1 in a prospective cohort of mainly septic patients with community-acquired pneumonia.

methodsWe evaluated 281 consecutive patients with community acquired pneumonia. Serum proET-1 plasma levels were measured using a new sandwich immunoassay.

resultsProET-1 levels exhibited a gradual increase depending on the clinical severity of pneumonia as assessed by the pneumonia severity index (PSI) and the CURB65 scores (p < 0.001 and p < 0.01). The diagnostic accuracy to predict bacteraemia of procalcitonin (AUC 0.84 [95% 0.74-0.93]) was superior than C-reactive protein (AUC 0.67 [95%CI 0.56-0.78]) and leukocyte count (AUC 0.66 [95%CI 0.55-0.78]) and in the range of proET-1(AUC of 0.77 [95%CI 0.67-0.86]). ProET-1 levels on admission were increased in patients with adverse medical outcomes including death and need for ICU admission. ROC curve analysis to predict the risk for mortality showed a prognostic accuracy of proET-1 (AUC 0.64 [95%CI 0.53-0.74]), which was higher than C-reactive protein (AUC 0.51 [95%CI 0.41-0.61]) and leukocyte count (AUC 0.55 [95%CI 0.44-0.65]) and within the range of the clinical severity scores (PSI AUC 0.69 [95%CI 0.61-0.76] and CURB65 0.67 [95%CI 0.57-0.77]) and procalcitonin (AUC 0.59 [95% 0.51-0.67]). ProET-1 determination improved significantly the prognostic accuracy of the CURB65 score (AUC of the combined model 0.69 [95%CI 0.59-0.79]). In a multivariate logistic regression model, only proET1 and the clinical severity scores were independent predictors for death and for the need for ICU admission.

conclusionIn community-acquired pneumonia, ET-1 precursor peptides correlate with disease severity and are independent predictors for mortality and ICU admission. If confirmed in future studies, proET-1 levels may become another helpful tool for risk stratification and management of patients with community-acquired pneumonia.

trial registrationISRCTN04176397.

Indexed as

Severity of Illness IndexAgedAged, 80 and overBacteremiaCommunity-Acquired InfectionsEndothelin-1FemaleHumansImmunoassayLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisPneumoniaPrognosisProtein PrecursorsEndothelin-1proendothelin 1Protein Precursors

Identifiers

PMID18304365
PMCPMC2335111
OpenAlexW2143135085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.