ArticleBMC evolutionary biology2008
Evolutionary dynamics of molecular markers during local adaptation: a case study in Drosophila subobscura.
Article in BMC evolutionary biology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Paternal leakage of mitochondrial DNA is genetically controlled in Drosophila.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Article
- Intraspecific Hybridization Improves Performance of the Biological Control AgentEvolutionary applications · 2026Article
- Evolutionary Dynamics of Gene Expression During Thermal Adaptation in Drosophila subobscura.Genome biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Mass-Rearing Conditions Do Not Always Reduce Genetic Diversity: The Case of the Mexican Fruit Fly,Insects · 2024Article
- Genomic Trajectories to Desiccation Resistance: Convergence and Divergence Among Replicate Selected Drosophila Lines.Genetics · 2017Article
- Status of research on Drosophila ananassae at global level.Journal of genetics · 2015Review
- History, chance and selection during phenotypic and genomic experimental evolution: replaying the tape of life at different levels.Frontiers in genetics · 2015Article
- Dynamics of genetic variability in Anastrepha fraterculus (Diptera: Tephritidae) during adaptation to laboratory rearing conditions.BMC genetics · 2014Article
- Fast evolutionary genetic differentiation during experimental colonizations.Journal of genetics · 2013Article
- Divergent evolution of molecular markers during laboratory adaptation in Drosophila subobscura.Genetica · 2010Article
- Playing Darwin. Part A. Experimental evolution in Drosophila.Theory in biosciences = Theorie in den Biowissenschaften · 2010Article
- Playing Darwin. Part B. 20 years of domestication in Drosophila subobscura.Theory in biosciences = Theorie in den Biowissenschaften · 2010Article
- FISH mapping of microsatellite loci from Drosophila subobscura and its comparison to related species.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2010Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNatural selection and genetic drift are major forces responsible for temporal genetic changes in populations. Furthermore, these evolutionary forces may interact with each other. Here we study the impact of an ongoing adaptive process at the molecular genetic level by analyzing the temporal genetic changes throughout 40 generations of adaptation to a common laboratory environment. Specifically, genetic variability, population differentiation and demographic structure were compared in two replicated groups of Drosophila subobscura populations recently sampled from different wild sources.
resultsWe found evidence for a decline in genetic variability through time, along with an increase in genetic differentiation between all populations studied. The observed decline in genetic variability was higher during the first 14 generations of laboratory adaptation. The two groups of replicated populations showed overall similarity in variability patterns. Our results also revealed changing demographic structure of the populations during laboratory evolution, with lower effective population sizes in the early phase of the adaptive process. One of the ten microsatellites analyzed showed a clearly distinct temporal pattern of allele frequency change, suggesting the occurrence of positive selection affecting the region around that particular locus.
conclusionGenetic drift was responsible for most of the divergence and loss of variability between and within replicates, with most changes occurring during the first generations of laboratory adaptation. We also found evidence suggesting a selective sweep, despite the low number of molecular markers analyzed. Overall, there was a similarity of evolutionary dynamics at the molecular level in our laboratory populations, despite distinct genetic backgrounds and some differences in phenotypic evolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.