Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18302733›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2008

UTILLdb, a Pisum sativum in silico forward and reverse genetics tool.

Marion Dalmais, Julien Schmidt, Christine Le Signor, Francoise Moussy, Judith Burstin, Vincent Savois, Gregoire Aubert, Veronique Brunaud, Yannick de Oliveira, Cecile Guichard and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Analysis of pea mutants reveals the conserved role ofProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Is it the end of TILLING era in plant science?Frontiers in plant science · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Mendel: From genes to genome.Plant physiology · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. LysM Receptor-Like Kinase LYK9 ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  19. Plant science's next top models.Annals of botany · 2020
    Review
  20. Article

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Marion DalmaisUnité de Recherche en Génomique Végétale, UMR INRA-CNRS, Rue Gaston Crémieux, 91057 Evry Cedex, France. dalmais@evry.inra.fr
Julien Schmidt
Christine Le Signor
Francoise Moussy
Judith Burstin
Vincent Savois
Gregoire Aubert
Veronique Brunaud
Yannick de Oliveira
Cecile Guichard
Richard Thompson
Abdelhafid Bendahmane

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The systematic characterization of gene functions in species recalcitrant to Agrobacterium-based transformation, like Pisum sativum, remains a challenge. To develop a high throughput forward and reverse genetics tool in pea, we have constructed a reference ethylmethane sulfonate mutant population and developed a database, UTILLdb, that contains phenotypic as well as sequence information on mutant genes. UTILLdb can be searched online for TILLING alleles, through the BLAST tool, or for phenotypic information about mutants by keywords.

Indexed as

Databases, GeneticGenes, PlantMutationAllelesDNA Mutational AnalysisEthyl MethanesulfonateMutagenesisMutagensPisum sativumEthyl MethanesulfonateMutagens

Identifiers

PMID18302733
PMCPMC2374714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.