ReviewDrug safety2008
A benefit-risk review of systemic haemostatic agents: part 1: in major surgery.
Review in Drug safety, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Tranexamic acid in head and neck procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2022Pooled it
- Prophylactic tranexamic acid to reduce blood loss and related morbidities during hysterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Obstetrics & gynecology science · 2022Article
- Global Current Practice Patterns for the Management of Hyphema.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2022Article
- Impact of Contraception on Uterine Fibroids.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2021Article
- Review of Oncology and Transplant Literature for the Management of Hepatic and Pancreatic Resections in Jehovah's Witnesses.Cancer medicine journal · 2021Article
- Concepts and Controversies in Haemostasis and Thrombosis Associated with Liver Disease: Proceedings of the 7th International Coagulation in Liver Disease Conference.Thrombosis and haemostasis · 2018Article
- Beneficial effects of early hemostasis on spinal cord injury in the rat.Spinal cord · 2016Article
- Non-contraceptive benefits of oral hormonal contraceptives.International journal of endocrinology and metabolism · 2013Article
- Acquired hemophilia as the cause of life-threatening hemorrhage in a 94-year-old man: a case report.Journal of medical case reports · 2010Article
- Interstitial plasmin activity with epsilon aminocaproic acid: temporal and regional heterogeneity.The Annals of thoracic surgery · 2010Article
- Temporally and regionally disparate differences in plasmin activity by tranexamic acid.Anesthesia and analgesia · 2010Article
- [Coagulation management in the treatment of multiple trauma].Der Anaesthesist · 2009Review
- A benefit-risk review of systemic haemostatic agents: part 2: in excessive or heavy menstrual bleeding.Drug safety · 2008Review
- Postoperative bilateral visual loss after a single dose of tranexamic acid.Anaesthesia reportsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Systemic haemostatic agents play an important role in the management of blood loss during major surgery where significant blood loss is likely and their use has increased in recent times as a consequence of demand for blood products outstripping supply and the risks associated with transfusions. Their main application is as prophylaxis to reduce bleeding in major surgery, including cardiac and orthopaedic surgery and orthotopic liver transplantation. Aprotinin has been the predominant agent used in this setting; of the other antifibrinolytic agents that have been studied, tranexamic acid is the most effective and epsilon-aminocaproic acid may also have a role. Eptacog alfa (recombinant factor VIIa) has also shown promise. Tranexamic acid, epsilon-aminocaproic acid and eptacog alfa are generally well tolerated; however, when considering the methods to reduce or prevent blood loss intra- and postoperatively, the benefits of these agents need to be weighed against the risk of adverse events. Recently, concerns have been raised about the safety of aprotinin after an association between increased renal dysfunction and mortality was shown in retrospective observational studies and an increase in all-cause mortality with aprotinin relative to tranexamic acid or epsilon-aminocaproic acid was seen after a pre-planned periodic analysis of the large BART (Blood conservation using Antifibrinolytics in a Randomized Trial) study. The latter finding resulted in the trial being halted, and aprotinin has subsequently been withdrawn from the market pending detailed analysis of efficacy and safety results from the study. Part 1 of this benefit-risk review examines the efficacy and adverse effect profiles of systemic haemostatic agents commonly used in surgery, and provides individual benefit-risk profiles that may assist clinicians in selecting appropriate pharmacological therapy in this setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.