Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18300349›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2008

Non-invasive diagnosis of H pylori infection: evaluation of serological tests with and without current infection marker CIM.

Sufi-H Z Rahman, M-Golam Azam, M-Anisur Rahman, M-S Arfin, M-Mahbub Alam, Tareq-M Bhuiyan, Nasim Ahmed, Motiur Rahman, Shamsun Nahar, M-S Hassan

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06273384 (Diagnostic Performance of Current Infection Marker), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06273384 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Diagnostic Performance of Current Infection Marker (CIM) for Helicobacter Pylori Infection in Patients With Peptic Ulcer Bleeding

TypeobservationalSponsorMahidol UniversityRan2024 to 2024Enrolled135ConditionsHelicobacter Pylori Infection, Peptic Ulcer Hemorrhage
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Non-invasive diagnostic tests for Helicobacter pylori infection.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review of Methods for DetectionJGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2025
    Review
  5. Role of H.pylori in Chronic Sore Throat by Using H.pylori Line.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Thin Layer Immunoassay: An Economical Approach to DiagnoseDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Diagnosis ofDiseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2015
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Sufi-H Z RahmanDepartment of Immunology,Bangladesh Institute of Research and Rehabilitation in Diabetes, Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders, Dhaka, Bangladesh. sufihannan@yahoo.com
M-Golam Azam
M-Anisur Rahman
M-S Arfin
M-Mahbub Alam
Tareq-M Bhuiyan
Nasim Ahmed
Motiur Rahman
Shamsun Nahar
M-S Hassan
Ibrahim Cardiac Hospital & Research Institute · BDBangladesh Institute of Research and Rehabilitation for Diabetes Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders · BDInternational Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research · BDCreighton University · USDeggendorf Institute of Technology · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo evaluate the performance of commercially available immunochromatographic (ICT) and immunoblot tests covering the current infection marker CIM and conventional ELISA for the diagnosis of H pylori infection in adult dyspeptic patients.

methodsConsecutive non-treated dyspeptic patients undergoing diagnostic endoscopy were tested for H pylori infection by culture, rapid urease test, and histology of gastric biopsy specimens. Serum from 61 H pylori infected and 21 non-infected patients were tested for anti-H pylori IgG antibodies by commercial ELISA (AccuBind ELISA, Monobind, USA), ICT (Assure H pylori Rapid Test, Genelabs Diagnostics, Singapore), and immunoblot (Helico Blot 2.1, Genelabs Diagnostics, Singapore) assays. ICT and immunoblot kits cover CIM among other parameters and their performance with and without CIM was evaluated separately.

resultsSensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of ELISA were 96.7%, 42.8%, 83.1%, 81.8%, and 82.9%, of ICT were 90.1%, 80.9%, 93.2%, 73.9%, and 87.8%, of ICT with CIM were 88.5%, 90.4%, 96.4%, 73.0%, and 89.0%, of immunoblot were 98.3%, 80.9%, 93.7%, 94.4%, and 93.9%, and of immunoblot with CIM were 98.3%, 90.4%, 96.7%, 95.0%, and 96.3%, respectively.

conclusionImmunoblot with CIM had the best performance. ICT with CIM was found to be more specific and accurate than the conventional ELISA and may be useful for non-invasive diagnosis of H pylori infection.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAntigens, BacterialBiomarkersBiopsyChromatographyDyspepsiaFemaleHelicobacter InfectionsHelicobacter pyloriHumansMaleMiddle AgedReagent Kits, DiagnosticSensitivity and SpecificityAntigens, BacterialBiomarkersReagent Kits, Diagnostic

Identifiers

PMID18300349
PMCPMC2690671
OpenAlexW2035266713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.