Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18299963›Full record

ArticleJournal of materials science. Materials in medicine2008

In vivo behaviour of two different biphasic ceramic implanted in mandibular bone of dogs.

Natalia Miño Fariña, Fernando Muñoz Guzón, Mónica López Peña, Antonio González Cantalapiedra

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. [Advances in the Application of Hydroxyapatite Composite Materials in Bone Tissue Engineering].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2021
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Natalia Miño FariñaDepartamento de Ciencias Clínicas Veterinarias, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, Campus universitario, s/n, 27002 Lugo, Spain. natmin@lugo.usc.es
Fernando Muñoz Guzón
Mónica López Peña
Antonio González Cantalapiedra

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alloplastic calcium phosphate bone substitutes such as hydroxyapatite (HA) and tricalcium phosphate (TCP) have been studied extensively due to their composition closely resembling the inorganic phase of bone tissue. On the same way, by manipulating the HA/TCP ratio it may be possible to change the substitution rate and the bioactivity of these materials, an advantage which has brought them to clinical use in oral and orthopaedic surgery. In this work, we evaluated the histological response in bone of two biphasic calcium phosphate ceramics by varying the proportion of their components. All premolars of 6 beagle dogs were removed from both sides of the mandible. Three months later, four cylinders composed of 85% HA and 15% beta-TCP (BCP 1) were implanted in the right side of mandible and other four cylinders composed of 15% HA and 85% beta-TCP (BCP 2) were implanted in the left side of mandible of dogs for 4, 12 ad 26 weeks, respectively. Two dogs were used in each time point. The histological study indicated that both biphasic ceramic were biocompatible. The earlier and more quantity of bone formed in BCP 2 than in BCP 1 suggested that the first one had a higher osteoinductive potential than the second one in mandibular bone. The resorption of the phosphate phase and the subsequent migration of bone into the resorbed portions were detected in both biphasic ceramics although two processes appeared faster in BCP 2 than in BCP 1. These dates conclude that varying the components of our biphasic ceramic we improve its osteoinductive potential.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsBone and BonesBone RegenerationBone SubstitutesCeramicsDogsEquipment DesignMaterials TestingMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningOsteogenesisProstheses and ImplantsTime FactorsBiocompatible MaterialsBone Substitutes

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.