Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18297557›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of primary health care2008

Use of quality improvement methods in Finnish health centres in 1998 and 2003.

Markku Sumanen, Irma Virjo, Harri Hyppölä, Hannu Halila, Esko Kumpusalo, Santero Kujala, Mauri Isokoski, Jukka Vänskä, Kari Mattila

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of primary health care, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Markku SumanenMedical School, Department of General Practice, University of Tampere, Finland. Markku.sumanen@kolumbus.fi
Irma Virjo
Harri Hyppölä
Hannu Halila
Esko Kumpusalo
Santero Kujala
Mauri Isokoski
Jukka Vänskä
Kari Mattila
Finnish Medical Foundation · FIKuopio University Hospital · FITampere University · FITampere University · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate how widely quality improvement methods are used in Finnish primary health centres and how the use has changed over five years.

designTwo national cross-sectional postal enquiries. SETTING AND SUBJECTS: The questionnaire in 1998 was sent to every other physician graduated during the years 1977-1986, and the questionnaire in 2003 to every other physician graduated during the years 1982-1991. The response rates were 73.9% and 62.2%. The answers of primary healthcare physicians (n = 503 vs. 344) were analysed.

main outcome measuresThe availability of 13 quality improvement methods was solicited. The change over five years was analysed.

resultsOpportunity to obtain continuing medical education (CME), in-service training, meetings, opportunity to consult a colleague in own speciality, and agreed guidelines on how a certain problem should be solved were highly reported both in 1998 and 2003. The biggest improvement (16.8%) concerned clinical guidelines. There was also progress with regard to quality improvement manuals at the place of work, opportunity to consult a colleague in another speciality, and computer-assisted monitoring of own work.

conclusionMany quality improvement methods were highly reported in both 1998 and 2003 in Finnish health centres. The biggest positive change concerns clinical guidelines.

Indexed as

Community Health CentersCross-Sectional StudiesEducation, Medical, ContinuingFamily PracticeFinlandHumansInservice TrainingQuality Assurance, Health CareSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID18297557
PMCPMC3406621
OpenAlexW2074941004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.