ArticlePharmacy world & science : PWS2008
Design of an algorithm to support community pharmacy dyspepsia management.
Article in Pharmacy world & science : PWS, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systematic review on the effects of the physical and social aspects of community pharmacy spaces on service users and staff.Perspectives in public health · 2022Pooled it
- Treatment of Heartburn: A Survey of Ontario and Québec Community Pharmacists.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Development of a decision support system for the practice of responsible self-medication.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2016Article
- Role of community pharmacists in patients' self-care and self-medication.Integrated pharmacy research & practice · 2015Review
- An elective course in differential diagnostics.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo design a care pathway and referral documentation system to support dyspepsia management in the community pharmacy according to national guidelines. To explore attitudes of community pharmacists and general practitioners (GPs) towards the proposed model of care.
settingFocus group of four community pharmacists from one locality and one-to-one interviews with five GPs in each of their surgeries in different city localities.
methodLiterature review; design of a care pathway and referral system; qualitative analysis of focus group discussion and one-to-one interviews.
main outcome measureModified design of documentation system; attitudes and barriers towards an extended role for pharmacists in a community pharmacy based model of individual care of patients with dyspepsia.
resultsThe care pathway and documentation system was modified to make it simple to use and to assure appropriate referral and reporting to GPs. All participants agreed that the SIGN guideline for Dyspepsia and local dyspepsia guidelines provide an opportunity to extend the role of pharmacists to prescribe therapeutic doses of H2 receptor antagonists, test for Helicobacter pylori in the pharmacy and prescribe eradication therapy. Perceived advantages to patients included better convenience and reduced waiting times for H. pylori testing. Current barriers to this model identified were: medico-legal issues, budgetary issues, limited access to patient data, lack of privacy to talk to patients, inadequate time and remuneration, no patient registration, patients describing vague symptoms and patient confidence in pharmacists.
conclusionThe proposed model of care and documentation system for community pharmacy based dyspepsia management generated a favourable response and design contributions from community pharmacists and GPs. Barriers were identified which have to be overcome prior to implementation and evaluation of the model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.