ArticleBMC bioinformatics2008
Human Pol II promoter recognition based on primary sequences and free energy of dinucleotides.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genomic benchmarks: a collection of datasets for genomic sequence classification.BMC genomic data · 2023Article
- Critical assessment of computational tools for prokaryotic and eukaryotic promoter prediction.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2022Article
- iProEP: A Computational Predictor for Predicting Promoter.Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2019Article
- CPPred: coding potential prediction based on the global description of RNA sequence.Nucleic acids research · 2019Article
- Review
- Accurate prediction of human essential genes using only nucleotide composition and association information.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2017Article
- A Brief Review: The Z-curve Theory and its Application in Genome Analysis.Current genomics · 2014Article
- Recognition of Protein-coding Genes Based on Z-curve Algorithms.Current genomics · 2014Article
- Rule-based knowledge acquisition method for promoter prediction in human and Drosophila species.TheScientificWorldJournal · 2014Article
- An ensemble method for predicting subnuclear localizations from primary protein structures.PloS one · 2013Article
- Recognition of prokaryotic promoters based on a novel variable-window Z-curve method.Nucleic acids research · 2012Article
- The human genome: a multifractal analysis.BMC genomics · 2011Article
- Eukaryotic and prokaryotic promoter prediction using hybrid approach.Theory in biosciences = Theorie in den Biowissenschaften · 2011Article
- A rebuttal to the comments on the genome order index and the Z-curve.Biology direct · 2011Article
- An improved classification of G-protein-coupled receptors using sequence-derived features.BMC bioinformatics · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPromoter region plays an important role in determining where the transcription of a particular gene should be initiated. Computational prediction of eukaryotic Pol II promoter sequences is one of the most significant problems in sequence analysis. Existing promoter prediction methods are still far from being satisfactory.
resultsWe attempt to recognize the human Pol II promoter sequences from the non-promoter sequences which are made up of exon and intron sequences. Four methods are used: two kinds of multifractal analysis performed on the numeric sequences obtained from the dinucleotide free energy, Z curve analysis and global descriptor of the promoter/non-promoter primary sequences. A total of 141 parameters are extracted from these methods and categorized into seven groups (methods). They are used to generate certain spaces and then each promoter/non-promoter sequence is represented by a point in the corresponding space. All the 120 possible combinations of the seven methods are tested. Based on Fisher's linear discriminant algorithm, with a relatively smaller number of parameters (96 and 117), we get satisfactory discriminant accuracies. Particularly, in the case of 117 parameters, the accuracies for the training and test sets reach 90.43% and 89.79%, respectively. A comparison with five other existing methods indicates that our methods have a better performance. Using the global descriptor method (36 parameters), 17 of the 18 experimentally verified promoter sequences of human chromosome 22 are correctly identified.
conclusionThe high accuracies achieved suggest that the methods of this paper are useful for understanding the difficult problem of promoter prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.