Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18294337›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2008

Population pharmacokinetics of chloroquine and sulfadoxine and treatment response in children with malaria: suggestions for an improved dose regimen.

Celestino Obua, Urban Hellgren, Muhammed Ntale, Lars L Gustafsson, Jasper W Ogwal-Okeng, Toufigh Gordi, Markus Jerling

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Celestino ObuaDepartment of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Urban Hellgren
Muhammed Ntale
Lars L Gustafsson
Jasper W Ogwal-Okeng
Toufigh Gordi
Markus Jerling
Karolinska University Hospital · SEMakerere University · UGABS Consulting (United States) · USUniversity at Buffalo, State University of New York · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

what is already known about this subject* Both chloroquine (CQ) and sulfadoxine/ pyrimethamine (SDx/PYR) remain important drugs in the control of malaria. * The available data on CQ, SDx and PYR are summary pharmacokinetic parameters based on classical/traditional methods, mostly in adults. * No study has described the population pharmacokinetics of a fixed-dose CQ + SDx/PYR combination in children with falciparum malaria. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS: * This study presents population pharmacokinetic data on CQ and SDx in children with uncomplicated falciparum malaria. * The study demonstrates that in age-based fixed-dose regimens with CQ and SDx, drug exposures and outcomes may be correctly predicted, although correlation with body weight is poor. * The study proposes dose modification to improve response with the CQ + SDx/PYR combination.

aimsTo describe the pharmacokinetics of chloroquine (CQ) and sulfadoxine (SDx), and to identify predictors of treatment response in children with malaria given the CQ + SDx and pyrimethamine (PYR) combination.

methodsEighty-six Ugandan children with uncomplicated falciparum malaria, 6 months to 5 years old, were randomly treated with prepacked fixed-dose CQ + SDx/PYR. The youngest children (<24 months) received half strength and the older (>24 months) full strength treatment. The reported day 14 failure rates were 48% and 18%, respectively. Capillary blood (100 microl) applied on to filter paper was collected on eight occasions during 28 days of follow up. Concentrations of CQ and SDx were determined. A population approach was used for the pharmacokinetic analysis.

resultsA two-compartment model adequately described the data for both CQ and SDx. For CQ, the typical apparent clearance (CL/F) and volume of distribution (V(C)/F) values were estimated to be 2.84 l h(-1) and 230 l. The typical CL/F for SDx was 0.023 l h(-1), while the factor relating its V(C)/F to normalized body weight was 1.6 l kg(-1). Post hoc parameter estimates for both drugs showed lower maximum concentrations (C(max)) and concentration-time curve areas (AUC(0,336 h)) in younger children. The AUC(0,336 h) for SDx and CQ were independently significant factors for prediction of cure. Simulations suggest that giving the higher dose to the youngest children would result in higher CQ and SDx concentrations and improved outcome.

conclusionsThe study results suggest that full-strength combination to all children would improve the cure rate.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Infective AgentsAntimalarialsChild, PreschoolChloroquineDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleHumansInfantMalaria, FalciparumMaleSulfadoxineTreatment OutcomeUgandaAnti-Infective AgentsAntimalarialsChloroquineSulfadoxine

Identifiers

PMID18294337
PMCPMC2291366
OpenAlexW2125271163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.